Calculating Maclaurin Series for f(x) = (10x^2) e^(-2x)

chrono210
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
For the function f(x) = (10x^2) e^(-2x), I calculated the first term of the Maclaurin series to be 0.

However, for the second term, I also calculated it to be 0, but apparently this is wrong. Shouldn't the second term be f'(x) = 10x^2 * -2e^(-2x) + e^(-2x) * 20x? Or what am I doing incorrectly here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that is not wrong, apparently or not! If f(x)= 10x^2e^{-2x} then, yes, f(0)= 0. f'(x)= 20xe^{-2x}- 20x^2e^{-x}= 20(x-x^2)e^{-x} which is also 0 at x= 0. You don't get a non-zero term until the second derivative: f"(x)= 20(1- 2x)e^{-x}- 40(x-x^2)e^{-x} which is 20 when x= 0. The first non-zero term of the series is (20/2)x2.

Actually, you don't need to do any differentiations for this. Presumably you know that the MacLaurin series for ex is \Sum x^n/n! so the MacLaurin series for e-2x is \Sum (-2x)^n/n!= \Sum (-2)^nx^n/n! and so the MacLaurin series for 10x^2e^{-2x} is \Sum 10(-2)^n x^{n+2}/n!.
 
Is x the point at which the series is evaluated? Or is it the argument of the series, e.g. the x in Taylor series f(a) + f'(a)(x - a) + ...?
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, that is not wrong, apparently or not! If f(x)= 10x^2e^{-2x} then, yes, f(0)= 0. f'(x)= 20xe^{-2x}- 20x^2e^{-x}= 20(x-x^2)e^{-x} which is also 0 at x= 0. You don't get a non-zero term until the second derivative: f"(x)= 20(1- 2x)e^{-x}- 40(x-x^2)e^{-x} which is 20 when x= 0. The first non-zero term of the series is (20/2)x2.

Actually, you don't need to do any differentiations for this. Presumably you know that the MacLaurin series for ex is \Sum x^n/n! so the MacLaurin series for e-2x is \Sum (-2x)^n/n!= \Sum (-2)^nx^n/n! and so the MacLaurin series for 10x^2e^{-2x} is \Sum 10(-2)^n x^{n+2}/n!.
Interesting. Granted, this is an online-based homework program, so I wouldn't be surprised if it had an error in it (although it's been fine so far this semester). When I put in 0 for the first term, it indicated "correct", but when I put in 0 for the second term, it indicated "incorrect". Thanks for the help!
EnumaElish said:
Is x the point at which the series is evaluated? Or is it the argument of the series, e.g. the x in Taylor series f(a) + f'(a)(x - a) + ...?
Not sure exactly what you mean by this, but the question just asks to find the first five terms of the Maclaurin series for the function.

EDIT: I figured out the problem. Apparently if a term is 0, it wants you to just skip to the next one...but it still wants the first term at 0? *wishes this thing would make sense*
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top