Calculating Magnetic Field for a Circular Wire with Given Parameters

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field generated by a circular wire with specific parameters. The initial attempts at the solution incorrectly omitted the current in the magnetic field formula and miscalculated the contributions from multiple wires. Participants emphasize the importance of considering vector components and the correct positioning of the point where the magnetic field is measured. The correct approach involves using trigonometry to resolve the magnetic field vectors and ensuring the current is included in the calculations. Ultimately, the correct magnetic field value is confirmed to be 24 µT, highlighting the need for accurate application of formulas and vector addition.
riken9
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Heres the question: http://imgur.com/aFJFxLa

Homework Equations


B = μ0/2∏r


The Attempt at a Solution


μ0 = 4∏*10^-7
Magnetic field = μ0/2∏r + μ0/2∏r
= μ0/2∏(0.05) + μ0/2∏(0.05)
= 4*10^-5

The answer is 24*10^-6 T. I need some assistance on what i may be doing wrong.

My 2nd attempt at question:
B = μ0/4∏*(5+5)Sin 53.1/(0.08)^2 <== this is still wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well first of all, you are fergetting something in your formula for the magnetic field...
check it (hint: it will have to depend also on the current, right??)

Then consider in which point you are computing the field (in order to be 5cm away from each wire) and draw the forces in that point... the apply correctly trigonometry (the fields will not be simply aligned, you will have to compute a sum of vectors) and here is the result
 
Opps I forgot to put the current in formula; but I assure you I used it. And can you explain mor about the point, can I pick a point outside the picture I provided, which is 5 cms away from each wire and forms 2 right angle triangles. Also which method should I be using the first one or the 2nd one (1st or 2nd attempt)
 
Actually no one of your attempts is correct (as far as I understand at least, it is difficult to see what is denominator and what is numerator but no problem).

Anyway OK for the fact that you find two right angle triangles. Then you have to compute the value of the field in that point (simply with your formula), and only then you compute (considering that the field vector is tangential to the circumference passing through your point) the components (you will have to compute the angles). Then the components in one direction will cancel while the components in another direction will add up. Do the sum and you're done. By the way, I got really ##24 \mu T##.
 
Isn't what I did with the 1st attempt correct, I just need to add angles and is the hypotense the magnetic field?
 
Ok, yes, if you compute correctly the components you are actually adding (using angles) and use the current, then yes, it is your first attempt
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top