Calculating Magnetic Flux Density for an Electron Orbiting Near Earth's Surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic flux density of Earth for an electron orbiting near its surface, equating magnetic force with centripetal force to derive the magnetic field strength as 8.9e-12 Tesla. Participants express confusion about the neglect of gravitational force and its potential impact on the electron's rotation direction and magnetic force. It is suggested that the gravitational force is negligible in this context. The user attempts to calculate the electron's velocity using the magnetic field strength but arrives at an implausibly high value of 2.37e13, indicating a possible error in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate mathematical application in physics problems.
Ben King
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've been given a question to find the magnetic flux density of the Earth if an electron is orbiting near to the surface. The answer to the question makes the magnetic force equal to the centripetal force and solves for B from there.

However, I am confused to why the gravitational force has no effect and won't the direction of rotation of the electrons have an effect on the direction of the magnetic force and hence the magnitude of the centripetal force? Thanks

The answer given was 8.9e-12 Tesla
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

(In the future, please use the Template that you are provided when starting a new schoolwork thread -- it helps to organize your post).

I'd start by comparing the Lorentz force to the gravitational force on the electron. Maybe the gravitational force is negligible...? Can you show us the calculations?
 
Thanks for the reply. Your suggestion about the gravitational force being negligible is true I think, so that answered that question. However I altered the equation to find velocity of the electron if the magnetic field strength was the same as the surface magnetic field strength of the Earth and got an answer that was way too large, I'll show the equation below. Is there an error in my maths?
##v=(Bqr/2m) \pm 0.5*\sqrt{(Bqr/m)^2+(4Gm/r)} ##
from ##v^2-(Gm/r)-(Bqr/m)v=0##
I googled the mean value for magnetic field strength on the Earth's surface and found it to be ~##45e-6## Tesla, but when I used that number in the formula I got an answer of ##v=2.37e13##, which is obviously not correct. Thanks again
 
IMG_20180523_223407.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180523_223407.jpg
    IMG_20180523_223407.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 424
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top