Calculating Maximum Load Resistance for MC7805 Integral Regulator

  • Thread starter Thread starter peripatein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Regulator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum load resistance for an MC7805 integral regulator, specifically focusing on the conditions under which a BJT (Q2) remains inactive. Participants explore the implications of quiescent current and load resistance values in relation to the regulator's operation.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the maximum load resistance based on the quiescent current and proposes that it is 625Ω.
  • Another participant calculates the maximum current through Ry and derives a critical load current of 58.67mA, leading to a critical load resistor value of 85.22Ω.
  • There is confusion regarding whether 85.22Ω represents the maximum load resistance for which Q2 remains inactive, with some participants questioning if a higher resistance could also keep Q2 inactive.
  • Some participants suggest that replacing the 85.22Ω resistor with a slightly higher value (e.g., 90Ω) would not activate the BJT, while a lower value (e.g., 80Ω) would.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the interpretation of "maximum load," seeking clarification on whether it refers to the highest load resistance that keeps Q2 inactive.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the maximum load concept is akin to maximum current demand on a power supply.
  • There is a request for clarification regarding the source of the 5V used in calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the maximum load resistance value. There are competing views on whether 85.22Ω is indeed the maximum load resistance that keeps Q2 inactive, with some suggesting that higher values could also satisfy this condition.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of "maximum load" and "minimum load resistance," indicating a need for clearer definitions in the context of the regulator's operation.

peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My question concerns MC7805, integral regulator, used as a high current voltage regulator. See figure attached. Now, I am told that Ry=7.5Ω and that Q2 is on the verge of conductance with VBE,on=0.5V. Using the Max. Quiescent Current from the manufacturer's data sheet (see attachment) I am asked for the maximal load resistance which could be attached so that Q2 would still not conduct.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Based on the data sheet (unless I misread the info. there), the Max. Quiescent Current is 8.0mA. Should the calculation hence be 5V/8mA=625Ω? Am I given the value of Ry so that I may deduce that most of the current would be passing through it (as its value is quite small)? On the verge of conductance the current flowing through it would be 0.5V/7.5Ω but how does/should that affect my calculation?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 495
  • MC7805.pdf
    MC7805.pdf
    223 KB · Views: 323
Physics news on Phys.org
Max current through Ry = 0.5V/7.5Ω = 66.67mA.
Quiescent current = 8.0mA, so the critical load current = 58.67mA.
The critical value of the load resistor = 5V/58.67mA.

( It must be the minimal load resistance in ohms ).
 
Last edited:
But is that the maximal load resistance so that Q2 is yet inactive?
 
peripatein said:
But is that the maximal load resistance so that Q2 is yet inactive?

If the value of the load resistor is smaller than 5V/58.67mA = 85.22Ω, the current through Ry will be greater than 8mA+58.67mA = 66.67mA, and Q2 will conduct current as VBE becomes greater than 0.5V. ( 66.67mA*7.5Ω = 0.5V ).
 
Question is, what would happen should that 85.22ohm resistor be replaced with a 90ohm resistor, for instance? As, if in that case the BJT would still be inactive, then 85.22ohm could not be the answer.
 
peripatein said:
Question is, what would happen should that 85.22ohm resistor be replaced with a 90ohm resistor, for instance? As, if in that case the BJT would still be inactive, then 85.22ohm could not be the answer.

As said in #2: The critical value of the load resistor (85.22Ω) is the minimum value. Replacing it with 90Ω will not activate the BJT, but if you replace it with 80Ω, the BJT will be activated.
 
Last edited:
So now I am under the impression that I am truly not following. I was asked to find the MAXIMAL load for which the BJT would still be inactive. From your answer I understand that it would be possible to connect an even greater load than 85.22ohm and yet the BJT would remain inactive. If so, 85.22ohm could by no means be the answer to my question.
What is the GREATEST load possible so that the BJT is yet inactive?
 
peripatein said:
So now I am under the impression that I am truly not following. I was asked to find the MAXIMAL load for which the BJT would still be inactive. From your answer I understand that it would be possible to connect an even greater load than 85.22ohm and yet the BJT would remain inactive. If so, 85.22ohm could by no means be the answer to my question.
What is the GREATEST load possible so that the BJT is yet inactive?
This is a point of confusion to many.

You are most likely asked to find the maximum load for which Q2 will not be conducting. This means determine the lowest load resistance under which Q2 can be guaranteed to not be conducting.

maximum load is the same concept as maximum current, it's when the heaviest demand is made on a power supply---in the same way that 80W is greater than 20W
 
So is 85.22ohm indeed the answer?
 
  • #10
peripatein said:
So is 85.22ohm indeed the answer?
It looks like that's it.

@peripatein WAIT! Where did that 5V come from, that you are using in your maximum load calculations?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K