Calculating Minimum Width for 5 Interference Maxima

AI Thread Summary
Ramon is calculating the minimum width of a screen needed to display five interference maxima from a double slit experiment using a coherent light source with a wavelength of 554 nm and a slit separation of 1.5 mm. The relevant equation is λ/s = w/D, where λ is the wavelength, s is the slit separation, w is the width between maxima, and D is the distance to the screen (90 cm). Initially, there was confusion regarding the number of maxima, as Ramon mistakenly considered ten instead of five. After clarification, he correctly identified that the calculation should yield four widths for the five maxima, leading to the correct answer. The problem highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the number of maxima in interference patterns.
msk172
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ramon has a coherent light source with wavelength 554 nm. He wishes to send light through a double slit with slit separation of 1.5 mm to a screen 90 cm away. What is the minimum width of the screen if Ramon wants to display five interference maxima?


Homework Equations



λ/s = w/D

λ= wavelength (554nm - converted to 5.54e-4 mm)
s= slit separation (1.5mm - provided by question)
w= width between maxima (use 5w do to question asking for 5 interference maxima)
D= distance to screen (90cm - converted to 900mm provided by question)

The Attempt at a Solution



Given that three of the four variables are known values, this should be simple as plug and solve. For some reason it is not liking the answer I am providing. The left side of the equation is simply 5.54e-4 / 1.5 which one would set equal to 5w / 900. Where am I going wrong here? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Follow up: Figured it out. Initially thought of the question as asking about 5 maxima per side (thus 10 total). One maxima in the center, two per side, 5 total. w * 4 yields correct value.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top