Calculating Molar Energy Change in Molecular System Conversion?

Chemist@
Messages
115
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a molecular system containing X type molecules and Y type molecules. X and Y can interconvert, and each has two energy levels (given below). The population in moles (n), of each energy state for X and Y, are given at equilibrium of T=300K.

For X n0=0.8 and E0=0
and n1=0.2 and E1=?

For Y n0=0.6 and E0=0
and n1=0.4 and E1=?

What is the molar change in energy for total conversion from a completely populated X state to a completely populated Y state?


Homework Equations


Don't know which equation to use. I just think that the population amount is proportional to the energy.


The Attempt at a Solution


The change is X→Y .Seems as at T=300K the second energy level of X has a four times bigger energy than the first level. For Y, the energy of the second level is 1.5 times bigger than of the first one, but as the first one has E=0, I am clueless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're supposed to use the Boltzmann distribution here... There are four different states where the molecule can be, and the relative probability of it being in a state with energy ##E## is ##\exp\left(-\frac{E}{k_{B}T}\right)##. Remember to normalize the probabilities with the partition function ##Z##.

This should work, as far as I know, but honestly I'm not sure whether the fact that identical molecules in the same state are indistinguishable would affect the form of the probability distribution here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top