Calculating Momentum of a Puck with Given Velocity and Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter zaraox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the momentum of a puck given its velocity vector and mass. The subject area is physics, specifically focusing on the concept of momentum as a vector quantity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate momentum using two different methods: one based on the magnitude of the velocity and another using the vector form directly. Participants question which approach correctly represents momentum as a vector.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of treating momentum as a vector. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of momentum, and there appears to be a consensus forming around the vector approach, though it is not explicitly stated.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the correct interpretation of momentum in terms of its vector properties, and the original poster's calculations lead to different potential answers, which raises questions about the assumptions made in the calculations.

zaraox
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A puck has a velocity of 3i –4j m/s and a mass of 20 kilograms. What is the momentum of the puck?

A. 100 Ns
B. 60i – 4j Ns
C. 60i – 80j Ns
D. 23i – 24j Ns

Alright, so I calculated the velocity from the resultant vector to be 5 m/s. So:

p = mv
p = 20 kg x 5 m/s
p = 100 Ns

But I can also do this:

p = mv
p = 20(3i - 4j)
p = 60i - 80j Ns

So what answer is right, A or C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello zaraox,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Momentum is a vector (it is not a scalar quantity). That means momentum has both magnitude and direction. Which one of your approaches preserves this property?
 
collinsmark said:
Hello zaraox,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Momentum is a vector (it is not a scalar quantity). That means momentum has both magnitude and direction. Which one of your approaches preserves this property?

So the answer would be C then? :)
 
zaraox said:
So the answer would be C then? :)
Sounds good to me.
 
Haha, embarrassingly simple. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K