Calculating Mu from a counterbalanced inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction (mu) from a physics lab involving an inclined plane and a pulley system. The student, Jared, is attempting to derive mu using the forces acting on a rolling cylinder, but is stuck on how to eliminate the mass variable (m) from his equations. Dan suggests applying Newton's laws to the counterbalance mass to determine the tension (T) and emphasizes the importance of measuring the mass of the cylinder for accurate calculations. Additionally, he hints at the possibility of using graphing methods as an alternative approach. The conversation highlights the challenges of solving physics problems involving multiple variables and the need for precise measurements.
Sadoian
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The physics homework for the weekend dealt with a lab we did the previous day. Currently I'm stuck, and wondering if anyone can help direct me in the right direction.

The lab consisted of an inclined plane with an attached pulley. We hooked up a rolling cylinder to a string, that went over the pulley, and on the other side we added weights to balance out the system. The next step was to slowly add weight until we could get the cylinder rolling up the plane at a nearly constant (or as close as we could get it) speed, and writing down how much mass we used to get the cylinder to move at that rate.

We students did this for a variety of angles for the plane, and took down just the mass of the counterbalance each time.


Now, our assignment for the weekend was to calculate mu from the data we took from the lab. We assumed that the pulley and string were both massless and frictionless. My train of thought (up to where I became stuck)

For the cylinder:

Sigma(F-subx) = m*a-subx
Sigma(F-subx) = 0 (since a-subx is 0, assuming nearly constant velocity)

T - m*g*sin(theta) - Friction = 0
T - m*g*sin(theta) - mu*m*g*cos(theta) = 0 (taken from vertical components of FBD)

So I get mu by itself and have:

mu = (T - m*g*sin(theta)) / (m*g*cos(theta))


Now, I have T, m, and mu that I do not have values for. I can find the numerical value for T -- (the weight of the counterbalance -> m*g). Even so, I'm still stuck with m without a value, and I don't really know how I can get m to cancel out, or to find a suitable substitute to solve the equation.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you for your time.

-Jared
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sadoian said:
The physics homework for the weekend dealt with a lab we did the previous day. Currently I'm stuck, and wondering if anyone can help direct me in the right direction.

The lab consisted of an inclined plane with an attached pulley. We hooked up a rolling cylinder to a string, that went over the pulley, and on the other side we added weights to balance out the system. The next step was to slowly add weight until we could get the cylinder rolling up the plane at a nearly constant (or as close as we could get it) speed, and writing down how much mass we used to get the cylinder to move at that rate.

We students did this for a variety of angles for the plane, and took down just the mass of the counterbalance each time.


Now, our assignment for the weekend was to calculate mu from the data we took from the lab. We assumed that the pulley and string were both massless and frictionless. My train of thought (up to where I became stuck)

For the cylinder:

Sigma(F-subx) = m*a-subx
Sigma(F-subx) = 0 (since a-subx is 0, assuming nearly constant velocity)

T - m*g*sin(theta) - Friction = 0
T - m*g*sin(theta) - mu*m*g*cos(theta) = 0 (taken from vertical components of FBD)

So I get mu by itself and have:

mu = (T - m*g*sin(theta)) / (m*g*cos(theta))


Now, I have T, m, and mu that I do not have values for. I can find the numerical value for T -- (the weight of the counterbalance -> m*g). Even so, I'm still stuck with m without a value, and I don't really know how I can get m to cancel out, or to find a suitable substitute to solve the equation.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you for your time.

-Jared

You forgot one crucial step: Do a Newton's Law problem on the counterbalance mass. That will give you a value for T. As far as m is concerned, if you are doing the problem the way you state it then you need to have measured it. The only other way involves graphing and you didn't mention that.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes Steve Clayton
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top