Calculating Net Force and Electric Field Using Coulomb's Law - Homework Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net force and electric field acting on charge A due to two equal and opposite charges B and C. The net force on charge A is calculated using Coulomb's Law, yielding a force of 1.35 N from each charge, which are then combined vectorially. The participant questions the method of adding forces at 45 degrees versus using x and y components, seeking clarification on the equivalence of these approaches. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying vector addition to determine the net force and electric field. The calculations for the electric field result in an approximate value of 190,919 N/C, highlighting the need for accurate vector analysis.
kurt1992
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is the charge distribution:B
|
|
| 2.0 m
|
|
A------------C
2.0 m

A = 2.0*10^-5 C
B = -3.0*10^-5 C
C = -3.0*10^-5 C

a) Find the net force on the charge

b) what is the net electric field acting on the charge

Homework Equations



FE=kq1q2/r^2

electric field = Fnet/q

The Attempt at a Solution



a) The charges acting on A are equal and at equal distance so they are then same.

F_E=(9.0*10^9)(2.0*10^-5)(-3.0*10^-5)/2^2

F_E=5.4/4

F_E=1.35 N

Each charge has a net force of 1.35 Newtons on charge 1. However, force is a vector quantity so the vectors have to have the same direction in order to add them. (The forces are the same so we can simply multiply the hypotenuse of the electric force by 2 to find the net force on particle 1.

(F_E/cos45)(2)=Fnet

3.81838=Fnet

Direction N45E

(is this correct? my books solution to the problem involves adding x and y components which make a very confusion solution.)

b)

ε=3.81838/(2.0*10^-5)
ε=190919 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kurt1992 said:
(F_E/cos45)(2)=Fnet
That's not right. Is that what you meant to write?
 
yes, i thought adding the vectors together at 45 degrees would be the same as adding x and y components and then using trigonometry to find the magnitude.
Is it not equivalent?
 
kurt1992 said:
yes, i thought adding the vectors together at 45 degrees would be the same as adding x and y components and then using trigonometry to find the magnitude.
Is it not equivalent?
Yes, if done correctly. Your answer was almost right, so I wondered if it was just a typo. If it's what you meant to post, please post your full working.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top