Calculating PD between +q and -q Charges at Points A & B

  • Thread starter Thread starter Highwaydude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pd
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential difference between two charges, +q and -q, located at points A and B, respectively, separated by distance R. The user attempts to solve the problem using two methods: integrating the electric field and directly calculating the potentials at both points. Both methods yield an absurd result of 2kq/0, indicating a potential error in the calculations. The user expresses confusion about the integration process, questioning the necessity of integrating when only two charges are present. Assistance is requested to clarify the integration limits and the overall approach to finding the correct potential difference.
Highwaydude
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Charges +q and -q at points A and B respectively separated by distance R. Required to calculate the potential difference between these 2 points.

Homework Equations



I want to do in two ways.. i.e once by integrating the electric field and the other by directly finding the potential at the two points and then subtract them to have the difference

The Attempt at a Solution


Both of my trials have yielded a 2kq/0 which is a bit absurd...
I do like this>
Vb -Va= - ((integration sign)kq/r^2 dr-(int.sign)kq/(R-r)^2 dr)
between the limits 0 to R.. It yields 2kq/0(wth!)-2kq/R...
So yeah.. I need help. Oh and K = 1/4pi e0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
please check if you are putting the limit right
 
also i don't knw why r u integrating when only two charges are present
 
i am calculating the net electring field... i guess the two kq/0's cancel out one being negative, but its just not coming. i mean bot hare coming out to be positive...
 
Heres the working... sorry, i can't find my mobile phone data cable.. had to do it in paint... http://hostmypicture.com/images/untitlete.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top