Calculating Period of a Pendulum: 1.18 s

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vandetah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Period
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the period of a pendulum using the formula t = 2π√(l/g), where l is the length of the pendulum and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The calculations provided yield a total period of 1.18 seconds by summing the periods for two different lengths of string. There is a correction noted regarding the application of the formula, emphasizing that the variable l should represent the distance from the pivot to the center of mass. Additionally, the conversation shifts to the equations of motion for a mass on a spring, suggesting a need for further details on the system for accurate analysis. The thread highlights the importance of correctly applying physics equations to obtain valid results.
Vandetah
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/540902_3288133970847_49118976_n.jpg

Homework Equations


t = 2\pi \sqrt{}\frac{l}{g}


The Attempt at a Solution


for t
t = 2\pi \sqrt{}\frac{l1}{g}

t = 2\pi \sqrt{}\frac{0.15m}{9.8 m/s^{2}}

t = 0.78 s

t = 2\pi \sqrt{}\frac{l2}{g}

t = 2\pi \sqrt{}\frac{0.04m}{9.8 m/s^{2}}

t = 0.4 s

total time t = 0.78 s + 0.4 s
total time t = 1.18 s

i changed the signs to positive because negatives don't have square root?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


You've misapplied the equation:
T=2\pi \sqrt{ \frac{l}{g} }... is the equation to find the period T of a simple pendulum. The variable l is the distance from the pivot to the center of mass. So your working just figures out the natural period of pendulums with different length strings.
(I wrote the equation out like that so you could see how to write equations in PF :) - hit the quote button to see how I did that.)

It sounds like you need the equations of motion for a mass on a spring - something that looks like:mg-kx=m\ddot{x}... the solution will be like:x(t)=A \cos(\omega t) + BSince you are not provided with details for the system - you'll be looking at a ratio method or an approximation for very small distances. eg. is the speed close to the equilibrium point very nearly constant? Of course there may have been data that you have not given us :)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top