Calculating PhiG: Understanding the Phase Difference Between Waves at w=1

AI Thread Summary
PhiG represents the phase difference between two waves at w=1, calculated as phiG = (delta t/T)*360. The calculation provided, phiG = (0.5/2pi)*360, yields 28.6 degrees, but the user is not achieving the expected results. The equation wt + phi = 2pi is referenced, though its origin is unclear. The discussion highlights a diagram issue where waveforms appear distorted near t=0, suggesting this region should be disregarded for accurate analysis. Understanding the concepts of period and phase delay in sine waves is emphasized as essential for mastering the topic.
Tekneek
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
282ic7c.jpg

Given w =1, What is phiG ? Is it the phase difference between the two waves? If it is, isn't it simply phiG = (delta t/T)*360 but I am not getting the right answer.

PhiG = (0.5/2pi)*360 = 28.6

Also I don't know where this wt + phi = 2pi equation comes from.
 
Last edited:
The period appears to be about 6.3 s

The diagram is drawn wierdly. The waveforms appear to have a fixed phase difference everywhere except near t = 0 where one has been deliberately distorted to force it through the point (0,0). That origin region would be best ignored, it is so wrong.

There is also a +/- sign associated with the phase difference, according to whether the system introduces a lead or lag, respectively.

I think you should do a google search on: period and phase delay of sinewave
as mastery of this fundamental material is crucial.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top