Is there an uncertainty between amplitude and phase in an EM wave?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between amplitude and phase in classical quasi-monochromatic electromagnetic (EM) waves, exploring whether an uncertainty exists between these two properties. Participants consider both classical and quantum perspectives, including implications for measurement and coherence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if there is an uncertainty between amplitude and phase in classical quasi-monochromatic light and seeks to understand the relationship to quantum uncertainty.
  • Another participant challenges the notion of classical uncertainty relationships, asking why such uncertainties would exist at all.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that variations in frequency (delta omega) imply that amplitude and phase are not constant, potentially affecting coherence.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to distinguish between experimental measurement uncertainty and theoretical definitions of waves, stating that classical waves have well-defined parameters in theory.
  • A reference is provided to a book discussing quantum optics, which mentions that in the limit of macroscopic fields, phase and photon number behave as complementary variables.
  • Another participant clarifies that the reference pertains to coherent states of large intensity, which aligns with the classical limit of the electromagnetic field.
  • It is noted that the complementarity mentioned in the reference specifically relates to phase and photon number, not amplitude.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and nature of uncertainty between amplitude and phase, with no consensus reached on the matter. The discussion includes both classical and quantum perspectives, indicating a lack of agreement on the implications of these uncertainties.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in measurement and the definitions of wave properties, as well as the potential impact of non-linear systems and multiple wave interactions on the discussion of uncertainty.

fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Is there an uncertainty between amplitude and phase in classical quasi-monochromatic light?(E(t)=a(t)cos(phi(t)-omega_0*t))If it exist, what is the relation between classical and quantum uncertainty(delta I* delta phi>=1/2)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
fxdung said:
Is there an uncertainty between amplitude and phase in classical quasi-monochromatic light?
Why would you think there are any classical uncertainty relationships at all?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Delta2 and DaveE
Because if we have a delta omega,then amplitude and phase are variant(the EM wave is not coherence any more?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
I think you need to make a distinction between experimental measurement uncertainty and uncertainty in the definition of the waves involved. Theoretically waves, in the classical sense, each have a well defined frequency and phase. Of course in the real world, you may have more than one wave, or a non-linear system where the wave parameters change wrt time, or the inability to measure the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=l-l0L8YInA0C&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Introduction to Quantum Optics: From the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light
Gilbert Grynberg, Alain Aspect, Claude Fabre
Section 5.3.6, p366: "In the limit of macroscopic fields, for small quantum fluctuations, phase and photon number look like complementary variables in the usual sense of quantum mechanics."
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, Klystron, vanhees71 and 1 other person
This refers to coherent states of large intensity and is well approximated by the classical limit of the em. field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
atyy said:
"In the limit of macroscopic fields, for small quantum fluctuations, phase and photon number look like complementary variables in the usual sense of quantum mechanics."

Note that this refers to complementarity between phase and photon number, which is not the same as amplitude.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
948
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K