Calculating Potential Difference for Electron Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter buttterfly41
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the potential difference required to accelerate an electron to 42.0% of the speed of light, the correct approach involves using relativistic kinetic energy rather than the non-relativistic formula. The non-relativistic equation K=0.5mv^2 is inadequate at high speeds, necessitating the use of K=γ(mc²-1), where γ is the Lorentz factor. The Lorentz factor γ is calculated as 1/√(1-(v/c)²). By applying this correct formula, the potential difference can be accurately determined. Using the proper relativistic calculations will yield the right answer for the potential difference needed.
buttterfly41
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
electricity problem :(

so here's the problem:

through what potential difference would an electron need to be accelerated for it to achieve a speed of 42.0% of the speed of light, starting from rest? The speed of light is c = 3.00e8 m/s

so i thought the equation i would use would be Vf-Vi=deltaPE / q

so i thougth the change in potential energy would be equal to the opposite of change in kinetic energy, so delta PE would = .5mv^2, and v is 3e8 X .42, so:

.5 X 9.11e-31 X (1.26e8)^2 / 1.6e-19 = 4520V, but this is wrong, so yea, no clue. any help would be much appreciated, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got the right idea. All of the potential energy should show up as kinetic energy of the electron. Where you went wrong is right here:

so delta PE would = .5mv^2,

The expression K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 is the nonrelativistic kinetic energy. In relativity there is a different expression:

K=\gamma\left(mc^2-1\right)
\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}

If you use the correct expression, you should get the correct answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top