Calculating Power Diminishment of Nuclear Battery and Solar Panel over Time

Fixxxer125
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The \alpha decay 238Pu →234U + \alphareleases 5.49 MeV energy. By a radio-thermal generator the decay energy is converted into electricity with an efficiency of 6.8%. The Voyager 2 spacecraft used such a nuclear battery. It was launched on 20.8.1977 and reached Neptune at 24.8.1989.
By which fraction was the electrical power diminished since launch?
By which fraction would the power from a solar panel have diminished in the
same period (distance Sun-Neptune = 30.1 AU)?
(\tau (238 Pu) = 127.16 years

Homework Equations


A(t)=A(0)exp(-T/\tau)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I can calculate by what fraction of the electrical power the battery has decreased since launch. If the initial activity is A(0) then in 12 years the activity should have decreased by a factor of exp(-T/\tau) so will be 91% of the initial level. Thus the electrical power output will have decreased by around 1/10th. However I am not sure how the power from a solar panel would change over time. Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy available from the solar battery is decreased at least by the amount the flux of energy from the sun is decreased by moving from 1 AU to 30.1 AU. Use the inverse square law.
 
Thanks I'll give it a go!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top