Calculating Power to Drag 100kg Log Down 20° Hillside at 0.50 m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoMeGusta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Log Power
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the power required to drag a 100-kg log down a 20° hillside at 0.50 m/s, one must consider the forces involved, including friction and gravitational potential energy. The work done against friction is represented as W_f = -μmgL cos(θ), while the change in potential energy is ΔU = -mgL sin(θ), where m is mass, g is acceleration due to gravity, and L is the length of the slope. The total power exerted by the man is given by P_man = μmgv cos(θ) - mgv sin(θ), resulting in a value of 247 J. The distinction between work and thermal energy in overcoming friction is noted but considered a minor point in this context. Understanding these calculations is essential for accurately determining the power needed in this scenario.
NoMeGusta
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What power must a man expend on a 100-kg log that he is dragging down a hillside at a speed of 0.50 m/s ? The hillside makes an angle of 20 degrees with the horizontal and the coefficient of friction is 0.9

m = 100kg
v = 0.50 m/s
\theta = 20 degrees
\mu = 0.9

From here I thought that W_{man} + W_{f} = \Delta U

So, W_{f} = - \mu mgL \cos{\theta} (that I understood), from here the books states that \Delta U = 0 - mgL \sin{\theta} Where did the book get this? What does the 0 represent? How do I find the Power?

The book then says that P_{man} = \mu mgv \cos{\theta} - mgv \sin{\theta} = 247J

Can someone walk me thru this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U is the proper variable symbol for potential energy, gravitational potential energy in this case.

The mgL \sin{\theta} is another way of say "mgh," but on this slope (think triangle), h is the opposide side where L is the hypotenuse. mgh is the change in potential energy. The work done by the guy has to do two things: change the potential energy of the log, and overcome friction.

Conceptual rant:
Depending of conventions and definitions, sometimes the work done to overcome friction is not called "work" but "the mechanical equivalent of heat." That last bit is a mouthful, and I haven't seen it too often in textbooks lately, so I guess it's OK to call it work; the only problem is that it is not a transfer of mechanical energy if it turns to thermal energy, it should be called heat. Alas this distinction is low on the scale of hair-splitting importance.[/concpetual rant]
 
What instrument do you play hemidemisimiquavers? I thought 16th notes were fast enough... geez, I can only imagine 64ths
 
NoMeGusta said:
What instrument do you play hemidemisimiquavers? I thought 16th notes were fast enough... geez, I can only imagine 64ths
I can handle short trills on the piano that are "hemis.":approve: As long as its with fingers 2 & 3 (the thumb is #1 on the piano)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top