Calculating refraction in continuous refractive index

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the deflection angle θ of light from a distant star as it passes near the sun, where the refractive index n is defined as √(1+5920/r). To approach the solution, Snell's law should be applied, considering the light's trajectory as it intersects thin annular layers around the sun. The discussion suggests treating the distance s from the sun as constant due to the small deflection. An integration of an infinite number of thin layers, with the refractive index varying as a function of r, is necessary for a complete solution. Overall, the calculation requires careful consideration of the light's path and the refractive index's dependence on distance from the sun.
vmedica
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is page 5 on: http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/olympiad/Downloads/PastPapers/Paper3_2010_.pdf

I will just summarise the question:

The refractive index of space,n, at a distance r from the sun is given by √(1+5920/r). The light from a distant star is deflected by a small angle θ. Using a simple model, calculate θ.

Homework Equations



Snell's law?

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea of how to get started with this question. I think that the model will involve some discrete layers but I still wouldn't know how to do the problem. Any help would really be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, use Snell's law. Consider a ray of light that would pass some distance s from the sun passing through a thin annulus at radius r. You can calculate the angle at which it intersects that annulus and hence the small adjustment to its trajectory. I think you can treat s as unchanging, since the deflection is small.
 
Seems to me data is missing, especially how close to the sun's surface does the beam get. I suppose you could make your answer a function of that distance as another poster suggests.

Then I'd say you need to do an integration of an infinite number of infinitely thin layers with n a function of r. For each layer Snell's law would apply.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top