Calculating Relative Velocity and Length Contraction in Special Relativity

jlmccart03
Messages
175
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


The problem states: Racer A and Racer B have the same care length, but from a spectators view Racer A looks (1/2) that of Racer B. Also Racer B is traveling at a speed v = (c/2). I am to find the spedd of Racer A in the spectators frame of reference.

Homework Equations


Length contraction Δx = (Δx0/ϒ)

The Attempt at a Solution


So what I did was simply realize that the length of the car stays the same in both the z and y directions, but changes in the x direction. This means that I don't have to worry about the z and y direction lengths as they are equal and cancel. From there I took the length contraction equation and got ΔxA = (ΔxB/2). The jist of that equation comes from the fact that x*y*z = ((x/2)*y*z) and everything but the x's cancel. That resulting answer looks like the length contraction eqaution. From there I just solved for v from the fact that ϒ=√(1-(v^2/c^2)). My final answer is v=(√3/4)c.

Now where I am confused is the fact that I never used the information of the c/2 for racer B. Was that unnecessary information given or did I do something wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jlmccart03 said:

Homework Statement


The problem states: Racer A and Racer B have the same care length, but from a spectators view Racer A looks (1/2) that of Racer B. Also Racer B is traveling at a speed v = (2/c). I am to find the spedd of Racer A in the spectators frame of reference.
Is that an accurate statement of the problem? A velocity of ##\frac{2}{c}## does not make sense. No velocity makes any sense unless a frame of reference is specified.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Is that an accurate statement of the problem? A velocity of ##\frac{2}{c}## does not make sense. No velocity makes any sense unless a frame of reference is specified.
Sorry, edited it should be (c/2) not (2/c).
 
jlmccart03 said:
Also Racer B is traveling at a speed v = (2/c)
Check the units. 2/c is not a speed, it is the inverse of a speed

EDIT: OK, I see you caught that.
 
phinds said:
Check the units. 2/c is not a speed, it is the inverse of a speed

EDIT: OK, I see you caught that.
Yeah, I typed it up wrong. It should be c/2.
 
jlmccart03 said:

Homework Statement


The problem states: Racer A and Racer B have the same care length, but from a spectators view Racer A looks (1/2) that of Racer B. Also Racer B is traveling at a speed v = (c/2). I am to find the spedd of Racer A in the spectators frame of reference.

Homework Equations


Length contraction Δx = (Δx0/ϒ)

The Attempt at a Solution


So what I did was simply realize that the length of the car stays the same in both the z and y directions, but changes in the x direction. This means that I don't have to worry about the z and y direction lengths as they are equal and cancel. From there I took the length contraction equation and got ΔxA = (ΔxB/2). The jist of that equation comes from the fact that x*y*z = ((x/2)*y*z) and everything but the x's cancel. That resulting answer looks like the length contraction eqaution. From there I just solved for v from the fact that ϒ=√(1-(v^2/c^2)). My final answer is v=(√3/4)c.

Now where I am confused is the fact that I never used the information of the c/2 for racer B. Was that unnecessary information given or did I do something wrong?
Yes you are right, though racer B is traveling and A is stationary. But for B it's stationary itsself but A is traveling and no need to use the speed given as due to speed , length is contracted
 
Praveen mahajan said:
Yes you are right, though racer B is traveling and A is stationary. But for B it's stationary itsself but A is traveling and no need to use the speed given as due to speed , length is contracted
Wait, now I am even more confused. So the problem asks for the speed of Racer A from the spectators view. A and B are both racing each other, but from the spectators viewpoint A is half the length of B. B is traveling at half the speed of light. Since we are focused on the racer A and not B then we don't have to worry about the speed v = c/2? I'm sorry, I am just really lost on how to look at these frames and whatnot.
 
I hope if both are moving and in the same direction, then the concept of relative velocity is also need to adopt
Which is given as (v1-v2)/(1-v1v2/c^2)
 
Praveen mahajan said:
I hope if both are moving and in the same direction, then the concept of relative velocity is also need to adopt
Which is given as (v1-v2)/(1-v1v2/c^2)
So I have to take my 0.84c value and subtract it from the c/2 value? Or is that prior to finding my speed value of car A?

EDIT: According to your previous statement I took the values of v1=√(3/4)c and v2 = c/2. Using that equation I got a totale v = 0.64c. Would that sound correct?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K