Calculating Resultant Force of 2 Fluids in a Tank

stuharis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. A tank with vertical walls, 2m wide and 2m long and 2.5m high, is filled with 4800 litres of water (density 1000 kg/m3) and 3200 litres of light oil (density 900 kg/m3). Calculate the magnitude and location of the resultant force on each of the vertical walls of the tank.

2. By doing some simple math the water goes up to 1.2 m of the tank and the oil continues further to a combined height of 2 m.

I solve this kind of problems by taking dF= ρghwdh. For the oil I take the integral from 0 to 0.8 and for water i take the same integral from 0.8 to 2. Then I find the moment for the side with the same way and through that i find the position of the force.

I know the solution is right for a single fluid. But is this right for 2 or more fluids on top of each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: what is the pressure at the oil-water interface? Do you think that the oil is heavier than the water?
 
I think the oil is above the water. What is bothering me is, if the water force is equal to dF=ρwghwdh from 1.2 to 2 or should i also add the force that the oil apllies to the water and use df=ρwghwdh(this integral from 1.2 to 2) + ρoghwl to add the pressure the oil adds?

ρw=density of water
ρo=density of oil
 
I guess you will need to decide whether it makes sense or not for the oil to press down on the water. :)
 
Yeap but I cannot really decide :S

Since oil stands on top of water isn't it logical to apply some pressure to the water?

Does anyone know?
 
It is logical, yes.

If it were just more water above the 1.2 m mark, it would contribute downward force and hence be part of the 'h' in the hydrostatic pressure ρgh. This is oil which weighs a little less, so it contributes a little less downward force (but not that much less!).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top