Calculating Scattered Photon Energy and Recoil Angle in Compton Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolski888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compton effect
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a homework problem related to the Compton effect, specifically calculating the energy of a scattered photon, the kinetic energy of a recoiled electron, and the recoil angle. The initial confusion arises from interpreting the scattering process of a 650-keV gamma ray interacting with an electron. The Compton effect equation is utilized to find the new wavelength and frequency of the scattered photon, with the initial wavelength derived from the gamma ray's energy. Participants emphasize the importance of using conservation of momentum to determine the recoil angle, suggesting that the angle should be reconsidered based on momentum rather than energy alone. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying the relevant physics principles to arrive at the correct solution.
wolski888
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 650-keV gamma ray Compton-scatters from an electron. Find the energy of the photon scattered at 110°, the kinetic energy of the scattered electron, and the recoil angle of the electron.

Homework Equations


Compton effect equation:
Δλ = λ^{'} - λ = (h/mc) (1-cosθ)

Conservation of Energy:
hf + mc^{2} = hf^{'} + E_{e}

hf is initial photon energy, mc^{2} is electron energy before scattering, hf^{'} is the energy of scattered photon with new frequency f prime, and E_{e} is the energy of the recoil electron with mc^2 and Kinetic Energy.

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all I am confused about the question. Are they saying a gamma ray is scattered? Or does a gamma ray hit the electron producing a scattering photon and the electron recoils?

For now, I am thinking that the gamma ray hits the electron (the latter mentioned).

For the recoil angle, I am thinking that it should be 80° since momentum is conserved and so the electron goes in the opposite direction, so 80°.

To find the energy of scattered photon I need to find the new frequency. My thought is that I need to find the new wavelength so that I can use f=c/λ. I can find the new wavelength using Compton Effect equation shown above. I know θ is 110°, and h,m,c are constants. But what about initial λ? Can I get that from the 650-keV? So E = 650-keV = hc/λ using h in terms of eV I can get λ. Right? Now I am all set to find the new wavelength.With that I can find the new frequency, and then find the scattering energy of the photon.

Now I should have all the information to find the Kinetic Energy using the Conservation of energy equation above.

Am I going the right way, any comments would be appreciated. Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all I am confused about the question. Are they saying a gamma ray is scattered? Or does a gamma ray hit the electron producing a scattering photon and the electron recoils?
What's the difference? I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make.

For the recoil angle, I am thinking that it should be 80° since momentum is conserved and so the electron goes in the opposite direction, so 80°.
You'll have to rethink this.

To find the energy of scattered photon I need to find the new frequency. My thought is that I need to find the new wavelength so that I can use f=c/λ. I can find the new wavelength using Compton Effect equation shown above. I know θ is 110°, and h,m,c are constants. But what about initial λ? Can I get that from the 650-keV? So E = 650-keV = hc/λ using h in terms of eV I can get λ. Right? Now I am all set to find the new wavelength.With that I can find the new frequency, and then find the scattering energy of the photon.
Good plan. You don't need to find the frequency though. The equation you already mentioned,
##E = hc/\lambda##, allows you to relate energy to wavelength directly.
 
Forget about the first question then. What do you mean rethink this? Should I use the Kinetic Energy of the recoiled electron to determine the angle?

EDIT: Or should I use conservation of momentum?
 
You need to use momentum. Energy doesn't have a direction whereas momentum does.
 
Many thanks! I'll get to it then.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top