Calculating slit width by length difference of 1st and 2nd minima

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the slit width using the distance between the first and second minima in a diffraction pattern. Given a wavelength of 635 nm and a distance of 2.5 m from the slit to the screen, the distance between the minima is 6 mm. Participants suggest using the equations for minima conditions and the small angle approximation to find the x values for the first and second minima. The key approach involves determining the difference between these x values to solve for the slit width. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the relevant equations to derive the slit width from the provided measurements.
Unemployed
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the slit width? Wavelength is 635 nm. Distance between screen and slit, 2.5 m. Distance on screen between first and second minima above the central maxima is delta 6 mm.


Homework Equations



D* sin theta * = m * lambda

tan theta = x/ distance between screen and slit



The Attempt at a Solution



I set lambda/sin theta m2-sin theta m1= 2*lambda/ sin theta m2

tan theta 2m = x + 6 *10^-3 m/2.5

I tried to plug it in, but i got stuck. What's the correct approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Unemployed, welcome to PF.
You have given the relevant equations. Now what is the condition for minimum on the screen? Write down two equations for x values.. One for first minimum and other for second minimum. Then find the difference between the x values. x2 - x1 value is given. Find D.
 
x1 = tan theta m1*2.5
x2 = (tan (theta m1 + theta m2) *2.5) + 6 *10^-3

Is theta for m2 half of what it is for m1?

Still puzzled.
 
for small angle sin θ can be written as tan θ = x/D, where x os the distance between screen and slit. Put m = 1 for first minimum and m = 2 for second minimum. Find x1 and x2. Difference between x1 and x2 is given. Find slit width d using the formula x/D = m*λ/d
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top