Calculating Solar Panel Power Output: Chain Rule & Arcsin Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter IntegrateMe
  • Start date Start date
IntegrateMe
Messages
214
Reaction score
1
The power output of a particular type of solar panel varies with the angle of the sun shining on the panel. The panel outputs P (θ) watts when the angle between the sun and the panel is θ for 0 ≤ θ ≤ π. On a typical summer day in Ann Arbor, the angle between a properly mounted panel and the sun t hours after 6 a.m. is θ(t) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 14. Assume that sunrise is at 6 a.m. and sunset is 8 p.m.

(A) Calculate dP/dt using the chain rule, and give interpretations for each part of your calculation.

P(θ(t)). So, dP/dt = P(θ(t))' = P'(θ(t)) * θ'(t)
P'(θ(t)) is the average rate of change of power with respect to θ.
θ'(t) is the average rate of change of θ with respect to t.

(B) Suppose θ(t) = arcsin(t/7 -1) + π/2. Calculate θ'(t) using the equivalent expression: sin(θ(t) - π/2) = t/7 - 1

I just differentiated the equivalent function:

cos(θ(t) - π/2)*θ'(t) = 1/7
θ'(t) = 1/(7*cos(θ(t) - π/2))

(C) Suppose dP/dθ (2π/3) = 12 and θ(t) is the function in part (B). Find the change in power output between 4:30PM and 5:30PM.

This is where I'm having trouble. I would think the "change in power output" would simply be dP/dθ, since this represents the change in power with respect to θ, but I feel as though I'm incorrect here. Any help would be awesome. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Change in power output is dP/dt here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top