Calculating Speed in Special Relativity: A Grade 12 Physics Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a Grade 12 physics problem involving special relativity and time dilation. Ludwig von Drake measures the half-life of a radioactive material, while Donald Duck, on a bomb moving at speed v, finds the half-life to be half of Drake's measurement. The key equation used is the time dilation formula, t = t0 / sqrt(1 - v²/c²), where t is Drake's time and t0 is Donald's proper time. By setting up equations based on their measurements and solving, the value of v is determined to be approximately 0.87c. The solution highlights the importance of understanding inertial frames of reference in special relativity.
BatmanACC
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Thanks for taking a look. The following question is that is that from a grade 12 academic physics course.

Homework Statement



Scientist Ludwig von Drake, while in his laboratory, measures the half-life of some radioactive material which is in a bomb, approaching with speed v. Donald Duck, who is riding on the bomb, also measures the half-life. His answer is a factor of 2 smaller than Ludwig's. What is the value of v, expressed as a fraction of c?

Answer: .87

Homework Equations



Special relativity equation: t=t0/square root (1-v2/c2) Note: 2 = squared
Other: I know there is at least one more I must use but for the life of me don't know what it is.

The Attempt at a Solution



First we set V=Drakes. If this is so than Donald's equation must be equal to:

t=[t0/square root (1-v2/c2)]/2

Therefore to= 2t[square root (1-v2/c2)]

The problem is in equating the equations. They end up cancelling out because one is a direct derivative of the other. This leads me to believe I need at least 1 more equation.

It must also be noted that while von Drake may use the special equation of relativity Donald duck cannot (at least this is what I figure). I say this because Donald duck is viewing the half-life from the bomb at rest, meaning he would be more in the realm of inertial frame of reference. What equation i now use knowing that I have no idea.

Thanks in Advance guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
t=t0/square root (1-v2/c2) (this is the time dilation formula)

t is Drake's time

t0 is the proper time which is Donald's time.

we are given that t = 2t0.

so you have equations:

t=t0/square root (1-v2/c2)
t = 2t0

so solve these 2 equations.
 
Donal Duck is measuring the proper time interval t_0, so the interval measured by Drake is t=t_o\lambda. We're given that t=2t_o. Dividing both equations we get that \lambda=(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})^{-1/2}=2. Solving the equation yields the solution.
 
Thanks guys. My solution set is similar to both of yours.

I used 2T= To/sqreroot(1-v2/c2) and 2T = To/x where x=.5

This yields sqreroot(1-v2/c2) = .5

Through squaring both sides and moving the variables/numbers around you obtain

.75c2=v2

Simply square root that to get the answer which is .866c=v

Once again thanks for your help!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top