Calculating the Angle of Projection for a Fired Cannon Shell

AI Thread Summary
A 1250 kg cannon fires a 55 kg shell at 566 m/s at a 39° elevation angle, with the cannon on frictionless rails allowing for recoil. The speed of the shell relative to the Earth is calculated to be 542 m/s, while the cannon recoils at -24 m/s. The discussion emphasizes the conservation of momentum in the horizontal direction for accurate calculations. The second part of the problem involves determining the angle of projection of the shell with respect to the ground, which requires understanding the velocity components. The solution involves vector addition of the cannon's and shell's velocities to find the correct angle.
rukawa1107
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A 1250 kg cannon, which fires a 55 kg shell with a speed of 566 m/s relative to the muzzle, is set at an elevation angle of 39° above the horizontal. The cannon is mounted on frictionless rails, so that it recoils freely.

What is the speed of the shell with respect to the Earth?

Vse=Vsm+Vme, Vme=Vse-Vsm, Vsm= 566m/s

MVi= 0 = 55kg(Vse)+1250kg(Vse-566m/s)

so, Vse=542m/s and Vme = 542m/s-566m/s = -24m/s

I have solved the first part by using the conservation of momentum.

However, I have some diffculty on the second part.


At what angle with the ground is the shell projected?

This angle of the shell relative to the ground can be given by the ratio

calculation however I am not so sure.

Can anyone please solve and show me how to solve the second part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Careful: Momentum is conserved in the horizontal direction only.

Once you correctly find the recoil speed of the cannon, you can find the velocity of the ball with respect to the Earth via:
\vec{V}_{b/e} = \vec{V}_{b/c} + \vec{V}_{c/e}

(It seems that Latex is not displaying. To find the velocity of the ball with respect to the Earth find the vector sum of the velocity of the cannon wrt Earth plus the velocity of the ball wrt the cannon.)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top