Calculating the charge if the electric field density = 0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the charge when the electric field density is zero, specifically addressing the integration of charge density over a spherical volume. Participants clarify that the variable 'r' represents the integration variable, while 'R' is a constant distance for evaluating the field. The correct integral for charge density involves using the limits from 0 to 'a' and should yield a charge of -2.09e-8 C, confirming that the point charge at the center behaves like a point charge of zero from outside the sphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field concepts and charge density
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the relationship between charge density and total charge
  • Proficiency in handling mathematical notation and variables in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric field equations for spherical charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in multiple dimensions
  • Review common mistakes in variable notation and dimensional analysis in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in electrostatics or charge distribution calculations will benefit from this discussion.

falyusuf
Messages
35
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Attached below.
Relevant Equations
Attached below.
Question:
846%2F8468799a-80b2-4052-85ae-161b13a4fffa%2Fimage.jpg

Relevant Equations:

1637429860368.png

1637429882368.png

My attempt:
1637429910033.png

1637429929135.png

Could someone please confirm my solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't look right.
1. Is r a variable or a constant?
2. Is dv = drdθdφ?
3. Is the integral of r3/100 = a3/100?
 
mjc123 said:
1. Is r a variable or a constant?
r is constant as it is the radius of the sphere whereas a is variable.
mjc123 said:
2. Is dv = drdθdφ?
yes, (for the sphere)
mjc123 said:
3. Is the integral of r3/100 = a3/100?
I was mistaken here, it should be a^4 / 400
 
falyusuf said:
r is constant as it is the radius of the sphere whereas a is variable.
You are integrating by dr from limits 0 to a, yet treat 4πr2 as a constant.
falyusuf said:
yes, (for the sphere)
Really? What are the dimensions on either side?
 
mjc123 said:
You are integrating by dr from limits 0 to a, yet treat 4πr2 as a constant.

Really? What are the dimensions on either side?
Is dv = r^2 sin theta dtheta dPhi dr ?
I tried to correct my mistakes and this is what I got:
1637438382719.png
 
Last edited:
I still think you're using r in a confusing way. Use r for the integration variable and R (constant) for the distance at which you want to evaluate the field. Then you are not integrating r3, but r5/R2.
 
mjc123 said:
I still think you're using r in a confusing way. Use r for the integration variable and R (constant) for the distance at which you want to evaluate the field. Then you are not integrating r3, but r5/R2.
Am I right now?
1637445069498.png
 
The integration variable is r, not R. And the upper limit is a, not R.
 
mjc123 said:
The integration variable is r, not R. And the upper limit is a, not R.
Sorry I was confused.
1637461115389.png

1637461154289.png


Right?
 

Attachments

  • 1637446546109.png
    1637446546109.png
    7.8 KB · Views: 151
Last edited:
  • #10
R is not 0.1 m. a is 0.1 m. You should have R2 in the denominator for both expressions, and it will cancel out.
You need to be very careful in distinguishing the various distances and using consistent notation for them. Too many rs is a recipe for confusion.
 
  • #11
mjc123 said:
R is not 0.1 m. a is 0.1 m. You should have R2 in the denominator for both expressions, and it will cancel out.
You need to be very careful in distinguishing the various distances and using consistent notation for them. Too many rs is a recipe for confusion.
Thanks for clarifying. I solved it using two methods and I got the same magnitude with opposite sign. Could you please figure out my mistake?
1637589653658.png

1637589697386.png
 
  • #12
I'm not quite sure what you're doing in method 2, but the point charge at the centre should be equal to minus the charge obtained by integrating ρ over the volume of the sphere. So from outside it behaves like a point charge of zero.
I think your answer of -2.09e-8 C is correct. (I did it in my head and got -2.09e-4 C; I think I must have accidentally switched the factor of 100 from the bottom to the top:).)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: falyusuf
  • #13
mjc123 said:
I'm not quite sure what you're doing in method 2, but the point charge at the centre should be equal to minus the charge obtained by integrating ρ over the volume of the sphere. So from outside it behaves like a point charge of zero.
I think your answer of -2.09e-8 C is correct. (I did it in my head and got -2.09e-4 C; I think I must have accidentally switched the factor of 100 from the bottom to the top:).)
I got it now.. Thank you so much. Appreciate your help.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
968
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K