Chemistry Calculating the Concentration of N/5 HCl After Removal of 3.65g

  • Thread starter Thread starter xiphoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concentration Hcl
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the concentration of N/5 HCl after removing 3.65g from a solution that was initially 1 liter and reduced to 250ml through boiling, one must first determine the moles of HCl present. The molar mass of HCl is 36.5g/mol, which helps in calculating the initial moles and adjusting for the amount removed. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding molarity versus normality, noting that normality is less commonly used in modern chemistry. There is some confusion about the terms, with participants clarifying that molarity (M) is the relevant measure for this problem. Ultimately, the solution requires careful application of concentration definitions and equations found in textbooks.
xiphoid
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On boiling 1litre of N/5 HCl, the volume of the aqueous solution decreases to 250ml. If 3.65g of HCl is removed from solution, then the concentration of resulting solution becomes?
N/5
N/2.5
N/20
N/10

Homework Equations


HCl=36.5g/ mol


The Attempt at a Solution


no idea
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use concentration definition. You start with 1L of solution - how much solvent? How many moles of HCl? How much solvent after the boiling? How much HCl?
 
At this point you should know about Molality.
There should be an equation for it (Molality) in your textbook... I think that Borek wants you to look it up rather than me tell you what the equation is. You'll really need to memorize what the equation is anyway (don't worry, it's straight forward).
 
ohms law said:
At this point you should know about Molality.
There should be an equation for it (Molality) in your textbook... I think that Borek wants you to look it up rather than me tell you what the equation is. You'll really need to memorize what the equation is anyway (don't worry, it's straight forward).

not molality (m) but molarity (M). There is a subtle, but important difference. And I do not think that that is where your problem lies because normality (N) is a "drop in" substitute for molarity (M) for monofunctional reagents.

"Equivalent weights" and "Normality" are no longer used by chemists (since a IUPAC ruling in the mid 1960s), but they have lingered on in engineering and in sections of the chemical industry. They become problematic because of ambiguities, where, for example, nitric acid as oxidant may have functionalities of 1, 3, 4, or 5, for its various oxidation reactions, meaning that the exact same solution could be regarded as 0.1 N, 0.3 N, 0.4 N, or 0.5 N!
 
oops, sorry. That's what I meant (Molarity). Damn.
I've never heard of "normality" before.

Molality (m=mol/kg) is what we were doing about two weeks ago, so... *shrug*
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top