Calculating the electric field

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field at the position of charge q_0 due to charges q_1 and q_2, the horizontal components of the electric fields must be determined using vector decomposition. The correct horizontal distance for q_1 is L/2 due to the equilateral triangle configuration, which affects the calculation of the electric field. The values obtained for the electric fields from q_1 and q_2 need to be adjusted to account for the cosine of the angles involved. The total horizontal component should then be recalculated by combining these adjusted values. Accurate vector addition is crucial for obtaining the correct resultant electric field at q_0.
symmet
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem:

Three charges are at the corners of an equilateral triangle as in the figure below:

....(+)q_1
.../...\
.../...\ L
.../...\
...q_0(+)____(-)q_2L = .06 m
q_0 = 1.8*10^-6 C
q_1 = 6.6*10^-6 C
q_2 = -4.6*10^-6 C

Calculate the electric field at the position of q_0 (the origin) due to q_1 and q_2.
Answer is a vector in terms of i and j.

My approach was to break down q_1 and q_2 into vector components. For example, to find the horizontal components, I did:

E_x = k(q/x^2)

where x is the horizontal distance from position q_0 and q is the charge. (k = 8.99*10^9)

So, plugging this in for both q_1 and q_2, I got:

q_1: E_x = -659266.67 N/C
q_2: E_x = 114872.22 N/CI put a - on q_1 because of the direction of the vector at q_0. Adding these together I get -544394.45 for the total horizontal component. But this isn't right. Can anyone tell me where I've gone wrong in my thought process? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what the answer is?

Umm... well, it's a vector, so you would need a cosine for your horizontal q_1 field at point q_0.
 
It's online homework, so no I don't know what it is.

Well since it is an equilateral triangle, all sides are the same length L and all angles are 60 degrees. I know that the q_1 charge is L/2 away from q_0 horizontally because it is equilateral (and Lcos60 = L/2). That is what would be substituted for x in the equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top