Calculating the Electric Potential at the Center of the Rectangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter kraigandrews
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the center of a rectangle formed by three charges, resulting in a potential of V_center = 1.78×10^5 V. Participants express confusion about determining the electric energy expended when moving charge q3 to infinity while keeping q1 and q2 fixed. Key equations mentioned include V = kq/r for electric potential and W = Vq for work done. Clarifications emphasize the importance of distinguishing between electric potential and potential energy, and the need to use the correct distances between charges for calculations. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding the total potential energy of the system and how it changes with the movement of charge q3.
kraigandrews
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


q3---a-----|
| |
| b
| |
q1---------q2

The figure shows three charges q1, q2 and q3 situated at corners of a rectangle of sides a = 15.0 cm and b = 6.0 cm.
For q1 = 5.90 μC, q2 = -5.90 μC, and q3 = 1.60 μC find the electric potential at the center of the rectangle.
V_center = 1.78×105 V

Continuing with the figure above, how much of the electric energy of the system would be expended in moving q3 to infinity while q1 and q2 remain in their positions?

Im at a loss as how to do this part, I have tried to find the field at the center with q3 no longer there and everytime it works out to be 0, so I am just not sure what to do here.


Homework Equations


V = kq/r
W = Vq



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the electric potential energy between a pair of charges?
 
using V=kq1/a + kq2/a = 0... or at least I think.
 
kraigandrews said:
using V=kq1/a + kq2/a = 0... or at least I think.
Don't mix up potential with potential energy.

See: Electric Potential Energy
 
ok so U = kq1q2/a... correct? Or should I use the center of the rectangle as the radius?
 
kraigandrews said:
ok so U = kq1q2/a... correct? Or should I use the center of the rectangle as the radius?
You should use the distance between the charges. What's the total PE of the system? How does that change when q3 is moved to infinity?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top