Calculating the h factors Arfken 2.1.3

  • Thread starter Thread starter russjack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factors
russjack
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The u v z coordinate system used frequently in electrostatics and hydrodynamics is defined by the u v z coordinate system which is xy=u x^2-y^2=v and z=z.
Sketch the system in the xy plane showing the surfaces of constant u and v.
Indicate the directions of the unit vectors. Is this coordinate system left handed or right handed.
And lastly calculate the h factors


Homework Equations


xy=u x^2-y^2=v and z=z.


The Attempt at a Solution


I found that the system was basically intersections of hyperbolas and the rational function 1/x. I found the system to left handed (I'm not quite sure if this is right). But I have no clue on where to even approach finding the h factors. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how much maths do you know? most of the examples quickly slip into some tensor notation, but there's a few that don't

the maths book by Riley Hobson Bence has a really good explanation in an appendix if I remember right

the scale factors help you calculate derivatives and integrals in different coordinate system, eg. they can be used to calculate that spherical coords need r.sin(theta) term in a volume integral, and similarly the representation of the grad, div & curl operators in a non-cartesian coord systems
 
actually section 10.10 in riley hobson bence
 
actually looks like you need to read section 2 in Arfken
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top