Calculating the mass of objects in ICE

  • Thread starter Thread starter smarties
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Mass
AI Thread Summary
To find the percentage of the block's mass that is the fossil, first, the total volume of the ice block is calculated as 17207 cm³. The mass of the ice is determined using its density, resulting in 15.77 kg. The mass of the fossil is calculated using its density, yielding an incorrect value of 62.63 kg. The correct approach involves setting up simultaneous equations for the total mass and volume, leading to the conclusion that the fossil's mass can be found by subtracting the mass of the ice from the total mass of the block. This results in the fossil's mass being approximately 6.02 kg, confirming the calculations align with the principles of density and mass.
smarties
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rectangular block of ice containing a fossil measures 426mm x 264mm x 153mm with a total mass of 21.8kg

Density of ice = 0.917g/cm3

Density of Fossil = 3.64g/cm3

What percentage of the block's mass is the fossil?


Homework Equations



Density = Mass/Volume
Mass = Density x Volume
Volume = Mass/Density


The Attempt at a Solution



Now I calculated the volume 17206992 but I thought that was too big so I changed the measurements to cm = 42.6cm x 26.4 x 15.3 V= 17207cm3

Now this is were it gets a bit hairy I calculate the Mass

M = Density x Volume = 0.917g/cm3 x 17207cm3 = 15778.81g = 15.77kg (ICE)

M = Density x Volume = 3.64g/cm3 x 17207cm3 = 62633.48g = 62.63kg (FOSSIL)

What have I done wrong here? I am not sure of the correct steps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know volume(fossil)+volume(ice)=total volume. Also density(fossil)*volume(fossil)+density(ice)*volume(ice)=total mass. That's two simultaneous equations in two unknowns. Solve for the two unknown volumes.
 
What about if take the 21.8kg convert it to grams 21800g minus the total mass of ice 15778g

Will that mean 21800-15778 = 6022g is the mass of the Fossil ? Surely it can't be that simple? Have I missed a step ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top