Calculating the Rate of Mass Falling Over an Area

  • Thread starter Thread starter physiker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Time Unit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the mass of dust particles falling over an area S with a given velocity v and density rho. It is confirmed that the mass falling over the area in unit time can be expressed as (rho)*(S)*v. The relationship involves understanding how velocity contributes to the rate of mass flow through the area, linking mass, volume, and density. Dimensional analysis supports that the equation results in mass per time, confirming its validity. Overall, the calculations illustrate the flow of mass through a defined area over time.
physiker99
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Assume there is an area S. Then we have dust particles falling over it having velocity v and density rho.
Is is correct to state mass falling over the S in unit time equals (rho)*(S)*v?

I guess it should be correct, because mass shouldn't have velocity component if none other cancels it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

physiker99 said:
Assume there is an area S. Then we have dust particles falling over it having velocity v and density rho.
Is is correct to state mass falling over the S in unit time equals (rho)*(S)*v?

Hi physiker99! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Yes. :smile:
I guess it should be correct, because mass shouldn't have velocity component if none other cancels it.

If you mean that, dimensionally, the 1/L3 in the M/L3 in rho has to be converted to 1/T, then that's correct.
 
I did a typo there. I don't understand how velocity is used to calculate mass.
 
physiker99 said:
I did a typo there. I don't understand how velocity is used to calculate mass.

It's not purely to calculate the mass. It also determines the rate per unit time through an area S. So you can rewrite S and v as:
Sv = S\frac{dr}{dt} = \frac{dV}{dt}
, with V a volume

The physical interpretation is that a volume V moves through an area S in dt time. See it as moving a cube through a square hole in dt time. The density is defined as mass per volume. So you can rewrite:
\rho \frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{d\rho V}{dt} = \frac{dM}{dt}
, with M the mass
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PF!

I'll just add this to what D.R. :smile: says:

dimensionally, rho is M/L3, S is L2, and V is L/T

so multiply them all together, and you get M/L3 x L2 x L/T, = M/T, which is mass per time. :wink:

oh, and welcome to PF, D.R.! :smile:
 
It's understood. Thanks a lot.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top