Calculating the Rate of Mass Falling Over an Area

  • Thread starter Thread starter physiker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Time Unit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of mass falling over an area S per unit time is accurately represented by the equation mass = (rho) * (S) * (v), where rho is the density of the dust particles, S is the area, and v is the velocity. This equation effectively combines the concepts of density, area, and velocity to determine the mass flow rate. The dimensional analysis confirms that the resulting units correspond to mass per time, validating the equation's correctness. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding how velocity contributes to mass flow through a defined area.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with density (rho) and its units
  • Knowledge of basic calculus for interpreting rates of change
  • Dimensional analysis techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mass flow rate in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about dimensional analysis in physics
  • Explore the relationship between density, volume, and mass
  • Investigate applications of mass flow rate in engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students studying fluid dynamics or mass transport phenomena will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the mathematical modeling of mass flow rates.

physiker99
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Assume there is an area S. Then we have dust particles falling over it having velocity v and density rho.
Is is correct to state mass falling over the S in unit time equals (rho)*(S)*v?

I guess it should be correct, because mass shouldn't have velocity component if none other cancels it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

physiker99 said:
Assume there is an area S. Then we have dust particles falling over it having velocity v and density rho.
Is is correct to state mass falling over the S in unit time equals (rho)*(S)*v?

Hi physiker99! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Yes. :smile:
I guess it should be correct, because mass shouldn't have velocity component if none other cancels it.

If you mean that, dimensionally, the 1/L3 in the M/L3 in rho has to be converted to 1/T, then that's correct.
 
I did a typo there. I don't understand how velocity is used to calculate mass.
 
physiker99 said:
I did a typo there. I don't understand how velocity is used to calculate mass.

It's not purely to calculate the mass. It also determines the rate per unit time through an area S. So you can rewrite S and v as:
Sv = S\frac{dr}{dt} = \frac{dV}{dt}
, with V a volume

The physical interpretation is that a volume V moves through an area S in dt time. See it as moving a cube through a square hole in dt time. The density is defined as mass per volume. So you can rewrite:
\rho \frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{d\rho V}{dt} = \frac{dM}{dt}
, with M the mass
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PF!

I'll just add this to what D.R. :smile: says:

dimensionally, rho is M/L3, S is L2, and V is L/T

so multiply them all together, and you get M/L3 x L2 x L/T, = M/T, which is mass per time. :wink:

oh, and welcome to PF, D.R.! :smile:
 
It's understood. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
938
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K