Calculating the reflected power from solar radiation on the moon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total power of solar radiation reflected from the Moon, given its albedo of 0.05. The initial confusion arises from whether to use half of the Moon's surface area or its cross-sectional area for calculations. The correct approach is to multiply the solar flux density by the Moon's cross-sectional area, as this represents the sunlight falling perpendicularly onto a disc of the same diameter. This clarification helps resolve the misunderstanding about the area used in the calculation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how solar radiation interacts with celestial bodies.
mell0r
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Question: The Moon has an albedo of 0.05. What is the total power of the solar radiation reflected from the Moon in units of 10^15 W?

My Answer: - To get my answer i multiplied the flux density of the sun measured on the moon, then multiplied it by half of the moon's total surface area, followed by the multiplication of the albedo value.

However, the mark scheme reads: 'Flux density of the Sun as seen on Moon times the cross-sectional area of the moon gives the total power of the solar radiation incident on the Moon. Multiplied by the albedo gives you the total power reflected.'

Could anybody explain why i should multiply by the cross-sectional area rather than half of the moon's surface area?

Cheers in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi mell0r! :smile:
mell0r said:
Could anybody explain why i should multiply by the cross-sectional area rather than half of the moon's surface area?

because the total sunlight falling on the moon is the same as that falling perpendicularly onto a flat disc of the same diameter as the moon :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
because the total sunlight falling on the moon is the same as that falling perpendicularly onto a flat disc of the same diameter as the moon :wink:

Thanks for such a sudden reply! :smile: It seems so obvious now, but my mind would just not accept it at the time haha... Thanks to the help of a handy ping pong ball lying around the house it's overcome it though now :-p
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top