Calculating the Required Charge for Gravitational Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the required charge Q to replicate the gravitational force between the Earth and the Moon, based on the assumption that gravity is electrical in nature. The user initially calculated Q to be 1.63 x 10^27 C but found it incorrect. Upon reviewing the work, it was noted that the user mistakenly equated Q*Q to 2Q instead of recognizing the correct relationship between the charges. The correct approach involves equating gravitational and electrostatic forces and simplifying the equation properly. The user acknowledged the error and expressed relief at identifying the mistake.
dfetnum
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The similarity of form of Newton’s law of gravitation and Coulomb’s Law caused some to speculate that the force of gravity is related to the electrostatic force. Suppose that gravitation is entirely electrical in nature—that an excess charge Q on the Moon and an equal and opposite excess charge –Q on the Earth are responsible for the gravitational force that causes the observed orbital motion of the Moon about the Earth. What is the required size of Q to reproduce the observed magnitude of the gravitational force?

Homework Equations


Fe=kQ1Q2/(r^2)
Fg=GM1M2/(r^2)

I used these values:
The gravitational constant (G) = 6.67 x 10^-11 Nm^2 / Kg^2 .
The mass of the Earth (m1) = 6.0 x 10^24 Kg .
The mass of the moon (m2) = 7.35 x 10^22 Kg .
The average distance from the center of the Earth to the center of the moon is 384,400,000 m
k=9 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I set Fg equal to Fe and using the above values found the value of Q to be 1.63 * 10^27 C, but it is incorrect. Any idea where I went wrong? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi dfetnum. Welcome to Physics Forums.

You'll have to show more of your work so that we can see what's gone wrong. How did you arrive at the number you found?

Note that if you equate your two force expressions that you can cancel out the distance (r2) variable right away.
 
Last edited:


Thanks!

So first I set Fe=Fg:

G*M(earth)*M(moon)/(r^2) = k*(QE)(QM)/(r^2)

radius's cancel out

G*M(earth)*M(moon) = k*(QE)(QM)

The problem stated that the charges are equal so:

G*M(earth)*M(moon) = k*2Q

Then I plugged in:

(6.67 x 10^-11 Nm^2 / Kg^2) * (6.0 x 10^24 Kg) * (7.35 x 10^22 Kg) = (9 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2) *2Q

I used a calculator to find Q
 


Ah. Q*Q ≠ 2Q :wink:
 


WOWWWWWWWWWW, how could I have done that. I spent way too long on this problem.

thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top