Calculating the Speed of a Charge at Point A in an Electric Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter s0mebody
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a charge at point A in an electric field, following the completion of previous parts of the problem involving electric potential and work done. The user successfully calculated the electric potentials at points A and B, as well as the work done on a charge moving between these points. However, they are uncertain about how to find the speed of the charge at point A, as they lack the mass needed for the kinetic energy equation. Participants clarify that the problem indeed requires the mass of the charge to solve for speed, indicating a potential oversight in the problem statement. The conversation highlights the importance of having all necessary variables to solve physics problems effectively.
s0mebody
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
For this question, I have solved letters a, b and c. I'm stuck at letter d.

Homework Statement


Two point charges ql = +2.40 nC and q2 = -6.50 nC are 0.100 m apart. Point A is midway between them; point B is 0.050 m from ql and 0.060 m from q2 (Fig). Take the electric potential to be zero at infinity. Find
(a) The potential at point A;
(b) The potential at point B;
(c) The work done by the electric field on a charge of 2.50 nC that travels from point B to point A.
(d) The speed of the 2.50 nC when it reaches point A, if it starts from rest at point B

Homework Equations



KE = 1/2 m v2 ?

The Attempt at a Solution


I have solved a, b and c

a) VA = -737 V
b) VB = -704 V
c) WB->A = +8.2 x 10-8 J

Now I'm stuck at letter D, how do i find the speed? I assume that I might need the equation of KE = 1/2 m v2.. But I don't know how to do it.

What I did was to put +8.2 x 10-8 J as my KE. However, I do not have a mass, so how do I do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is fine. You can't solve this problem without having the mass of the charge.
 
Oh you mean that the problem is missing the mass? If that's so then I cannot solve this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top