Calculating the speed of an object going down an incline

  • Thread starter Thread starter lull
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Speed
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed of an object sliding down an incline, first draw a free body diagram to identify the forces acting on the object, including gravity and friction. The coefficient of static friction determines whether the object will slide; if it's low enough, the object will have a net constant acceleration down the ramp. Using the net force from the free body diagram, calculate the net constant acceleration based on the object's mass. Apply kinematic equations of motion to find the velocity over time, considering the ramp's length and initial conditions. This analysis is crucial for understanding the motion of a bicycle descending the ramp.
lull
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, all. How do I find the speed of something going down a ramp if I know the total weight of the object (214 pounds) the angle of the ramp (15 degrees) the frictional coefficient (.0236) the ramp is 11 feet long.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free body diagram of the object (it's sliding and not rolling, right?, and it is released from rest at the top of the ramp?), showing the forces acting on it (gravity, friction) as vectors, then figure out what motion occurs.

If the coefficient of static friction is high enough, the object will not start sliding. If it isn't high enough, the object will have a net constant acceleration down the ramp. Once you use the FBD to figure out the net force down the ramp, use the object's mass to calculate the net constant acceleration, and use that in the kinematic equations of motion to calculate the velocity versus time for the block.
 
It is a person on a bicycle going down a ramp. And yes, they are at rest in the beginning.
 
Also, is it possible if anyone can provide a few formulas? This is for a project but we weren't given any formulas and only given all the information today and it's due tommorow >.<! Thank you all sooo much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top