Calculating the Time for a Car Chase: Kinematics Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving a police car and a speeder, where the police car accelerates after one second. Initially, the police car travels at 26.4 m/s while the speeder goes at 37.5 m/s, leading to a displacement difference after the first second. The calculations show that the time for the police car to catch the speeder is approximately 12.2 seconds, but after considering the initial second, the correct time is adjusted to around 13 seconds. Participants clarify their equations and reasoning, ultimately confirming the need to account for the initial delay in the police car's acceleration. The final consensus indicates that the correct answer is approximately 13.02 seconds.
vbrasic
Messages
71
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


We have that a police car is traveling at ##26.4## m/s, and that at a time, ##t=0##, a car speeds by at ##37.5## m/s. After ##1## s, the police car accelerates constantly at ##2## m/s2. We are asked to find the time, ##t##, where the police car catches the speeder.

Homework Equations


##v_f=v_i+at##, and ##s=v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2##. (Standard kinematics equations.)

The Attempt at a Solution


Granted that the police car is not accelerating for the first second, I chose to simply begin analyzing the motion at the ##1## s mark. In the first second, the police car moves, ##26.4## m, while the speeder moves, ##37.5## m. We have then, in this frame, that the speeder's displacement after ##1## s is given by, ##(37.5-26.4)+37.5t##. That is, I simply state that the initial position of the speeder is given by the displacement between the two vehicles after ##1## s. The police car's displacement is ##26.4t+t^2##. We simply rearrange then to solve the quadratic for ##t##, such that ##t=12.2## s. My book says the answer is ##13## s. I'm not sure if this is simply due to a rounding error, or if there's something wrong with my logic.
 
  • Like
Likes sunnnystrong
Physics news on Phys.org
Use: X-Xo = VoT + 1/2AT^2
For the police car:
X-Xo = 1/2(2)(T-1)^2 + (26.4)T
For the car:
X-Xo = (37.5)T

Set them equal to each other & solve for T :)
The trick is realizing that the police car has two components for distance...
 
vbrasic said:
t=12.2 s
I got 12.02 s as an answer.

Edit: I thought your method looked good.

Edit2: Oops. We both forgot to add back in the 1 second, so the answer looks like it should be 13.02 s.
 
  • Like
Likes sunnnystrong
sunnnystrong said:
For the police car:
X-Xo = 1/2(2)(T-1)^2 + (26.4)T
For the car:
X-Xo = (37.5)T
That will work too, but for the police car I think it should be:
x-xo = (0.5)(2)(t-1)2 + 26.4(t-1)
Edit: I'm sorry. If you are using xo = 0, then your equation is correct as it is written. That is probably what you intended.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sunnnystrong
TomHart said:
Edit2: Oops. We both forgot to add back in the 1 second, so the answer looks like it should be 13.02 s.

Well that explains it. I knew I was missing something. Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top