Calculating the upward and downward plasma speeds

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom-Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plasma Speed
Tom-Physics
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi!

I have trouble with calculating the upward and downward plasma speeds. I have the necessary data and an equation that is useful (I think), but I'm stuck.

Homework Equations


The shock jump number Zs=3 in this case , and I've calculated the shock wave speed (555 km/s), which was calculated from the plasma density. The densities are n1=30 cm^-3 and n2=90 cm^-3 if you want to know.
And now, I need the upstream and downstream plasma speeds.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that one equation that can be used is:
u'1/u'2==B2/B1=n2/n1Zs

Here, u'1 is the upward speed and u'2 the downward.
But this doesn't give me any solutions because we have two unknowns .I know that the answers should be -285 km/s and -95 km/s respectively.

I have data for the magnetic fields and proton temperatures. Can someone please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you add some context? This thread is literally the only google hit where "shock jump number" is used as an expression. What is that?

Shock wave of what, and how did you calculate its speed? What do the two different densities represent?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top