Calculating the volume of a nucleus

  • Thread starter Thread starter rebc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus Volume
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the density of a nucleus, specifically that of Iron, using its mass and volume formulas. Participants explore the implications of a formula for nuclear radius and its relation to density.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for nuclear radius and its derivation, questioning the assumption of constant density. There is an exploration of how to calculate varying densities for different elements based on the derived radius.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants seeking clarity on the implications of using a constant density assumption. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for empirical measurements or alternative formulas to compare densities of different elements.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the application of the radius formula for density calculations across different elements, as well as the need for specific measurements to derive varying nuclear radii.

rebc
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am to calculate the density of a nucleus, say, of Iron, with mass 55.845 amu.

Homework Equations


see below

The Attempt at a Solution


I come to notice that all elements have the same value for the volume if I use the formula:
$$mass=m=m_{amu}(1.66\times10^{-27}kg/1u)$$
$$volume=V=\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3$$
$$
radius=R=r_0 A^{1/3}, \ r_0=1.25\times 10^{-15}m
$$

$$density=\rho = \frac{m}{V} = \frac{A(1.66\times 10^{-27})}{4/3\pi r_0^3A}=\frac{(1.66\times 10^{-27})}{4/3\pi r_0^3}=constant?$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rebc said:
$$
radius=R=r_0 A^{1/3}, \ r_0=1.25\times 10^{-15}m
$$
As I read this, you are not measuring the radius. You are inferring the radius from the cube root of the atomic weight. It should be no surprise that when you then cube this radius you get something that is proportional to atomic weight. i.e. a constant figure for density.

What is the origin of that formula for radius?
 
I have just found it on wiki. How must I find the density then? how am I to find the radius of the iron nuclei to apply on the volume equation?
 
I may have misunderstood the thrust of your question. You expressed surprise ("?") that the density that came out of your formula was a constant. If we are to trust this Wiki page then the formula that you quote is indeed derived by an assumption of a constant density and there is no need for surprise:

"The stable nucleus has approximately a constant density and therefore the nuclear radius R can be approximated by the following formula,
##R=r_{0}A^{\frac{1}{3}}##
"

You've already written down an equation for the density.
 
jbriggs444 said:
I may have misunderstood the thrust of your question. You expressed surprise ("?") that the density that came out of your formula was a constant. If we are to trust this Wiki page then the formula that you quote is indeed derived by an assumption of a constant density and there is no need for surprise:

"The stable nucleus has approximately a constant density and therefore the nuclear radius R can be approximated by the following formula,
##R=r_{0}A^{\frac{1}{3}}##
"

You've already written down an equation for the density.
Yes I get what you're saying now. Now how do I get the radius for the density calculation?
 
rebc said:
Yes I get what you're saying now. Now how do I get the radius for the density calculation?
Again, I do not understand what you are asking. You have already written down a formula for density, complete with all constants filled in.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Again, I do not understand what you are asking. You have already written down a formula for density, complete with all constants filled in.
Oh sorry, I was to compare the densities of several elements(of varying masses, of course). But now using this formula for the radius, we end up with a constant which applies for any mass(as you've explained previously, the radius equation is derived). So now how am I to find the varying radii of nuclei of several elements?
 
rebc said:
Oh sorry, I was to compare the densities of several elements(of varying masses, of course). But now using this formula for the radius, we end up with a constant which applies for any mass(as you've explained previously, the radius equation is derived). So now how am I to find the varying radii of nuclei of several elements?
You cannot use an approximate formula that is based on an assumption of constant density to determine the densities of various elements and expect to come up with anything but the same density for all of them.

You are going to need to either perform a measurement yourself, find a measurement made by someone else or find a formula distilled from such measurements. I do not have anything to offer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
778
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
978
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K