Calculating thickness of a cast iron cylinder carrying pressure of 30Nmm^2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the thickness of a cast iron cylinder under a pressure of 30 N/mm² with a bore of 300 mm and a working stress limit of 25 N/mm². The formula used for the calculation is t = pd/2σ1, leading to an initial calculation of 180 mm, which was deemed excessively large. Further attempts to recalculate resulted in confusion over unit conversions and potential errors in the equations used. Participants emphasized the importance of checking quantities and units to avoid mistakes in the calculations. Ultimately, the consensus is that the thickness should be verified with correct parameters to ensure accuracy.
joe465
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A cast-iron cylinder of 300mm bore carries a pressure of 30 Newtons per square
millimetre; what should be its thickness for a unit working stress of 25 Newtons per
square millimetre?


2. Homework Equations

ó1 = pd/2t

t=pd/2tó1


3. The Attempt at a Solution

t=pd/2tó1

t= 30*300/2*25

=180mm

Its got to be wrong as its way too big but I am unsure on where I am going wrong, any help would be much appreciated.

Heres another attempt

ó1/pd=2t

25/(30*3000) = 2t

2t = 0.00277778

t= 0.0014mm (4dp)

Maybes this one, I am not sure.

Thanks, Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you check the quantities and units in the question. Also I think you have some typos in your relevant equations and solutions.
 
Thankyou for your reply.

This is the best i can get.

Assuming that the cylinder is a thin cylinder

o1 = pd/2t

where o1=Stress on the cylinder

This stress is the circumferential stress on the cylinder

p= Pressure

d=Diameter of he cylinder bore

t= thickness

Now we have been given

o1=25 N/mm^2

P=30N/mm^2

d=300mm

SO

We know

o1 = pd/2t

So the design criteria for the thickness becomes

SO t=pd/2o1 = (30x300)/(2x25)= 9000/50 = 180

Its thickness should be 180 mm .
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top