Calculating Time for Crate to Hit Ground After Falling from Cargo Plane

odaughert
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cargo plane is flying horizontally at an altitude of 11.5 km with a speed of 860 km/h when a large crate falls out of the rear loading ramp. (Ignore any effects due to air resistance.)

(a) How long does it take the crate to hit the ground?

Homework Equations



y=y+v(sub y)(t)+1/2a(sub y)(t)^2

v(sub y)=v(initial)(sin58)

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted these equations but since the initial speed of the crate is the same as the plane and there is no angle, I cannot find the y value of velocity, in order to find the time it took to hit the ground.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
odaughert said:
the initial speed of the crate is the same as the plane
That statement is correct, but I'm not sure what you mean about there being no angle.

Think about this: how fast is the plane moving vertically? In other words, what is the rate of change of the plane's height? As you said yourself, once you figure that out, the initial vertical speed of the crate will be the same.
 
When a large crate falls out of the rear loading ramp,

vx = 860 km/h =238.9 m/s

vy = 0

y = 11.5 km = 11500 m.

Use the kinematic equation to find time.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top