Calculating Torque: Nonuniform Bar with Fixed Pivot | Homework Example

  • Thread starter Thread starter mew1033
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating torque for a nonuniform bar with a fixed pivot at its center of mass. The bar has a weight of 70 Newtons, and two additional weights are placed on either side, creating clockwise and counterclockwise torques. The calculated clockwise torque is 100 Nm, and the counterclockwise torque is 120 Nm, leading to a net torque of 20 Nm in the counterclockwise direction. The weight of the bar does not affect the calculations since the pivot is at the center of mass, allowing for rotational equilibrium to be established. A 200 Newton weight must be placed 0.1 meters right of the center of mass to achieve balance.
mew1033
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A nonuniform bar 4 meters long has a weight of 70 Newtons. The bar is on a fixed pivot at its center of mass which is 1 meter from the heavy end. If a 300 Newton weight is placed 0.4 meters left of the center of mass and a 100 Newton weight is placed 1.0 meters right of the center of mass,
(a) What are the clockwise and counterclockwise torque values?
(b) What is the magnitude and direction of the net torque?
(c) where must a 200 Newton weight be placed to establish rotational equilibrium?


Homework Equations



Torque=Force*distance (If it's perpendicular, which it is)

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know weather the fact that the bar is 70 Newtons matters at all. Assuming it doesn't, here's what I have:

(a) Clockwise: 100 N. Because 1.0m*100N=100N
Counterclockwise: 120 N. Because 0.4m*300N=120N

(b) Magnitude: I really have no idea here.
Direction: Counterclockwise... ?

(c) Assuming everything else is correct, I would say it needs to be 0.1 meters right of the center of mass. That way both sides are 120N


All that assumes that the weight of the bar doesn't matter. Am I even close?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right in assuming the weight of the bar does not matter. This is because gravity is constant, and the pivot is at the center of mass. Intuitively, in most cases, you can think about the center of mass as a balancing point. Thus, without weights, the bar is balanced.

From the question, I can't tell which weight is on which side, but assuming your clockwise and counterclockwise are correct, then:

(a) You're right, although you need to make sure your units are Nm, the units for torque, not N, since you are multiplying force (N) by distance (m).

(b) Two torques in opposite directions cancel each other out, just as two people sitting on a see-saw can cancel each other out because they rotate in opposite directions. The convention is to give counterclockwise torque a positive sign and clockwise torque a negative sign perhaps because angles in math are done that way.

The net torque is the final rotation of the bar after all cancellations. In fact, there is already a cancellation: the two ends of the bar, which cancel each other and keep the bar balanced because the pivot is at the center of mass.

In your case, you have a 120 Nm torque and a -100 Nm torque, so what is your net torque? The magnitude of that is just the absolute value, just in case clockwise had won out and your net torque was negative. You have the direction right.

(c) On the money...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top