Calculating torque required to rotate objects

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the torque required to rotate a Nerf gun mounted on a motor, one must consider the gun's mass, dimensions, and the desired angular acceleration. The gun is modeled as a rectangular prism weighing 1.00 kg, measuring 30 cm long, 10 cm wide, and 5 cm thick. The torque can be determined using the formula Torque = I * alpha, where I is the mass moment of inertia and alpha is the angular acceleration. Resources for calculating mass moments for common shapes can be found online, which will aid in determining the necessary torque. Understanding these principles will help in selecting an appropriate motor for the project.
XepheraGeeb
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't have any background in any physics past high school, so I was wondering if someone could help me figure something out.
I'm trying to build a robot that involves shooting off a foam bullet from a Nerf gun at different angles. I want to have a motor attached to the center of the gun, turning it around so it can shoot between 0 degrees (straight) and 90 degrees (up). Now I want to figure out what kind of motor I need to do this, but for that I need to know the torque required to rotate the gun.

To make calculations easy, I think it would be easiest to assume that the gun is a perfect rectangular prism weighing 1.00 KG (it won't be that exact weight of course, but I thought it would be faster if I was shown how to do the calculations first then I could plug in the real numbers) 30 CM long, 10 CM wide, and 5 CM thick. The motor would have a shaft with a 2 CM radius (might look something like this: http://www.engineersgarage.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/Original/wysiwyg_imageupload/28714/Servo-motor-insight1.jpg) and would be placed in the center of the side of object.

To give you a picture of what it all looks like: At 0 degrees the gun is parallel to the ground and oriented straight like someone would hold a gun, so the object has a depth of 10 CM (it's width), 5 CM wide (it's thickness), and 30 CM long. At 90 degrees, it's now facing up so it has a depth of 30 CM (it's length), 10 CM long (it's width) and is still oriented so that it's 5 CM wide.

To recap:
-I'm assuming the gun is a perfect rectangle
-1 KG mass
-30 CM long, 10 CM wide, 5 CM thick
-2 CM shaft radius on motor
-Motor is connected to the center of the side of the gun
-trying to find the torque required to rotate the object 90 degrees, against gravity

If anyone could show me how to calculate this, or just point me in the right direction that would be helpful! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I think the torque required depends on the angular acceleration you want for the gun.
Torque = I * alpha, where I = mass moment of inertia and alpha = angular acceleration (consistent units)
You should be able to find formulas for mass moments for common shapes and axis of rotation by searching.
That might get you started.

Cheers,
Terry
 
Thanks Terry, I'l check it out
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top