Calculating Torque T & Q for I-Beams & Torsion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fantastic Fox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams Torsion
AI Thread Summary
To evaluate the torsion for two parallel I-beams supporting a 10kN load from a trolley, the formula angle theta = TL/GK can be used, with K defined for I-beams. Calculating torque T involves considering the distance between the beams, as a simple torque calculation could lead to beam rollover. The equation tau = T/Q requires determining Q for the I-beam, which is complex due to constraints on the bottom flange and deflections occurring in the web and upper flange. Given the multiple point loads and the specific conditions, a numerical solution may be necessary for accurate results. This problem may not have a straightforward solution without referencing detailed engineering resources like Roark's.
Fantastic Fox
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
You have two parallel I-beams. A trolley with 4 wheels runs on top, and carries a total load of say 10kN. How would you evaluate the torsion?

angle theta = TL/GK
where (for an I beam) K = [2bt^3 + (d - 2t)(thickness of web)^3] / 3
and t = thickness of flange
But, how would you calculate the torque T?
Say if the beams were 1m apart, if torque was simply 10kN x 0.5m, then the beam would roll over.


For the equation; tau = T/Q
how do you calculate Q for an I beam?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This isn't an easy question to answer. If you are running a trolley on an I-beam, that would mean, most likely, that the beam is set on the ground, effectively constraining the bottom flange from any deflections. That means all of the deflections will be in the web and the upper flange. Combined with multiple point loads, off the top of my I'd say you really need a numeric solution. Then again, I don't have a copy of Roark's in front of me right now to see if this type of problem has a general solution already formulated. You could simplify it to have one point load at the center of the two beams, but you're still in a tough spot.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top