Calculating Traction Force for Leg Fracture Treatment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the traction force required for leg fracture treatment using a Russell traction apparatus. The specified traction force along the leg is 25N, leading to calculations involving tension and angles. The participant attempts to determine the weight (W) based on the horizontal and vertical components of tension, concluding with a value of 0.056N for W. Concerns are raised about the relationship between tension and weight, particularly when considering changes in the angle of the pulleys. The conversation highlights the complexities of force calculations in traction systems without friction.
TyroneTheDino
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


When the thigh is fractured, the patient's leg must be kept under traction. One method of doing so is a variation on the Russell traction apparatus. If the physical therapist specifies that the traction force directed along the leg must be 25N, what must W be?
8b998626-cd0d-4df1-b3c6-7e95154208c7-original.png


Homework Equations



W=mg
T=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


I begin by saying that the horizontal dotted line has a force of 25N in each direction. Because that is where the traction force is. I believe that the horizontal component of tension in the rope is going to equal 25N as well. I use that to find my vertical components of tension. I solve: tan(35)=oppostie/25. I get the opposite to side to equal .028N. Because there are two of these tension in the horizontal direction. I get that the total tension that should be equal to W= .056N

I am wondering if somehow my solving is flawed
 
  • Like
Likes Ruth Baker
Physics news on Phys.org
The vertical component of tension is not equal to W.

There is no friction in the pulleys so what does that mean for the tension in the rope at all points?
 
CWatters said:
The vertical component of tension is not equal to W.

Just to clarify.. Suppose the 35 degree angle was reduced to zero by moving the two pulleys closer together. The vertical component would be zero but the system would still work wouldn't it.
 
TyroneTheDino said:
I solve: tan(35)=oppostie/25.

What is this?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top