Calculating Variance of a Sum of Independent Random Variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gauss M.D.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poisson
Gauss M.D.
Messages
151
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



During a two hour window, people are given the option of calling number X, donating $9.90, or number Y, donating $0.50.

X is Poisson distributed with 1500 calls/minute. Y is Poisson with 3750 calls/minute.

What is the probability that more than $2,000,000 is raised?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



X = number of calls to number X in 120 minutes = Po(120*1500) = Po(180000)

Y = number of calls to number Y in 120 minutes = Po(120*3750) = Po(450000)

Let Z = 9.9X + 0.5Y. We're looking for P(Z > 2,000,000).

Z should have an expectation of 1,782,000 + 225,000 = 2,007,000.

Now I want to approximate Z = Po(μ) with Z ≈ N(μ,σ). But I can't work out the standard deviation for Z. Using \sqrt{μ} doesn't give me the right answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gauss M.D. said:

Homework Statement



During a two hour window, people are given the option of calling number X, donating $9.90, or number Y, donating $0.50.

X is Poisson distributed with 1500 calls/minute. Y is Poisson with 3750 calls/minute.

What is the probability that more than $2,000,000 is raised?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



X = number of calls to number X in 120 minutes = Po(120*1500) = Po(180000)

Y = number of calls to number Y in 120 minutes = Po(120*3750) = Po(450000)

Let Z = 9.9X + 0.5Y. We're looking for P(Z > 2,000,000).

Z should have an expectation of 1,782,000 + 225,000 = 2,007,000.

Now I want to approximate Z = Po(μ) with Z ≈ N(μ,σ). But I can't work out the standard deviation for Z. Using \sqrt{μ} doesn't give me the right answer.

I would bet that you have already seen how to do it, but may have forgotten. So, if X and Y are independent random variables and a, b are numbers, how does the variance of Z = a*X + b*Y relate to Var(X) and Var(Y)? There is a standard formula. It is used over and over and over again, so you should get to know it if you don't already or have forgotten it.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top