Calculating Velocity & Kinetic Energy of Bicycle Racer Rolling Downhill

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigtymer8700
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final velocity and kinetic energy of a bicycle racer after losing a wheel while rolling downhill. The initial conditions include a speed of 11.0 m/s, a wheel mass of 2.25 kg, and a height of 75.0 m. The kinetic energy formula used is Kf = 1/2Mv^2 + 1/2(I)w^2, with the moment of inertia calculated as I = MR^2. The user attempts to apply energy conservation principles, calculating initial kinetic energy (Ki) and potential energy (Ui), and is trying to determine the final velocity (Vf) at the bottom of the hill. The calculations lead to a final velocity of 38.8 m/s, but there are uncertainties regarding the angular velocity (w) calculation.
bigtymer8700
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
A bicycle racer is going downhill at 11.0m/s when, to his horror, one of his 2.25kg wheels comes off when he is 75.0m above the foot of the hill. We can model the wheel as a thin-walled cylinder 85.0cm in diameter and neglect the small mass of the spokes.

I need to get the velocity at the bottom of the hill and KEtotal at the bottom

I know Kf=1/2Mv^2 + 1/2(I)w^2

Vo=11m/s
M=2.25kg
r=.425m

I know I=MR^2
I=.4064kg*m^2

would you use Ki+Ui=Kf+Uf to get w? or is there another way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that looks correct.
 
here was my attempt
Ki=136.125J
Ui=1653.75J
Kf=1/2mv^2+ 1/2Iw^2
Uf=0

for I am stuck on Kf
Its a thin cylinder so I=MR^2 for w did i calculate it correct? v=wr so 11/.425= 25.8rad/s
Ki +Ui=Kf + Uf
so 136.125J +1653.75J= 1/2mv^2 + .4064*(25.8)^2 +0

from here i solved for the v i plugged in 2.25kg into m and i got 38.8m/s as Vf
 
am i messing up on calculating the ang velocity (w)?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top