Calculating velocity with variable acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the velocity equation for an object with variable acceleration defined by a rational function. Initial attempts to use standard motion equations were unsuccessful due to the non-constant nature of acceleration. Suggestions included using differential equations and the chain rule to relate acceleration, velocity, and distance, but some mathematical manipulations were deemed incorrect. The conversation highlights the potential of using energy principles to derive velocity as a function of position, although concerns about the necessity of known energy changes were raised. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the need for a solid mathematical approach.
scain6043
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is not so much coursework as it is a thought experiment that has been bugging me for a while now.

1. Homework Statement


Find the equation for velocity either as a function of distance (x) or time (t).

I have an object whose acceleration is given by the rational function a(x) = (a+x)/(b-x) where x is the distance traveled and a and b are some constant.

The actual equation has many more values and constants in it but this simplified version should be fairly similar.

2. The attempt at a solution

First, I resorted to the motion equations but quickly realized that the acceleration is not constant. My second thought was to use motion equations that deal with variable acceleration that use jerk and so forth but soon found that due to the rational nature of the function a(x) that it is not possible to get a derivative that is a constant.

Yesterday, the idea came to me that if I took the derivative of a(x) my resulting function would have the units 1/(sec)2 which could be manipulated by taking the square root of the reciprocal to obtain time with respect to distance (x). However, this still does not solve the problem because I'm not sure if the manipulation is mathematically sound and this still does not solve the problem of variable acceleration. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
scain6043 said:
Yesterday, the idea came to me that if I took the derivative of a(x) my resulting function would have the units 1/(sec)2 which could be manipulated by taking the square root of the reciprocal to obtain time with respect to distance (x). However, this still does not solve the problem because I'm not sure if the manipulation is mathematically sound and this still does not solve the problem of variable acceleration. Any thoughts?
I would be surprised if that gave the correct t(x)

The goal is to solve the differential equation \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=\frac{a+x}{b-x}
I am the opposite of an expert at differential equations, but I'm thinking you might be able to separate it and integrate both sides twice:
∫∫\frac{b-x}{a+x}d^2x=∫∫dt^2
The left side would be easier to integrate if you wrote it like this:
∫∫\frac{b-x}{a+x}d^2x=∫∫\frac{b+a-(a+x)}{a+x}d^2x=∫∫(\frac{b+a}{a+x}-1)d^2x

I am not sure if this would give the correct solution. I replied to you so that I can also learn from this problem. I'm sure someone more knowledgeable will help soon.
 
Nathanael said:
I would be surprised if that gave the correct t(x)

The goal is to solve the differential equation \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=\frac{a+x}{b-x}
I am the opposite of an expert at differential equations, but I'm thinking you might be able to separate it and integrate both sides twice:
∫∫\frac{b-x}{a+x}d^2x=∫∫dt^2
The left side would be easier to integrate if you wrote it like this:
∫∫\frac{b-x}{a+x}d^2x=∫∫\frac{b+a-(a+x)}{a+x}d^2x=∫∫(\frac{b+a}{a+x}-1)d^2x

I am not sure if this would give the correct solution. I replied to you so that I can also learn from this problem. I'm sure someone more knowledgeable will help soon.
Hi Nathanial. You can't integrate it like that. It's not correct mathematically. But, here is something that will work:

By the chain rule:

##a = \frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=v\frac{dv}{dx}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{dv^2}{dx}##

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Nathanael
Chestermiller said:
It's not correct mathematically.
In particular ##\int d^2x## is meaningless. It can't be thought of as ##\int\int dx^2##.
Chestermiller said:
By the chain rule:
##a = \frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=v\frac{dv}{dx}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{dv^2}{dx}##
Yes, a trick worth noting. It's equivalent to working with energy instead of forces, ##F.dx = mv.dv##. Typically, it allows you to get v as a function of position in closed form, but not v as a function of time. Fortunately, the OP asks for either.
 
  • Like
Likes Nathanael
Thanks for the replies! I understand that using energy I can find the velocity but isn't that only if the change in energy is already known?
 
scain6043 said:
Thanks for the replies! I understand that using energy I can find the velocity but isn't that only if the change in energy is already known?
No way. Play around with the equations a little and see what you come up with.

Chet
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top