Calculating Vertical +Horizontal Forces of Beam in Equilib.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the vertical and horizontal reactions at supports for two beams, A and B. The user is struggling with discrepancies in their calculations compared to the results from LinPro software, particularly for Beam A where they calculated Vb as 40.4 kN instead of the expected 36.54 kN. Key points include the importance of correctly accounting for the direction of moments and the need to use the proper angle for supports at an incline. The user ultimately resolves their confusion by recognizing the influence of a connected side beam on their equilibrium equations. The conversation emphasizes the critical nature of understanding support configurations and moment calculations in structural analysis.
King_Silver
Messages
83
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Below are attached 2 beams, A and B. I have to calculate the vertical and horizontal reactions at both supports in both questions. I have done a lot of calculations and believe I have a good understanding of what is needed to be done however my forces are not balancing for some reason. We use a software called LinPro and for Beam A the following answers are given: Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN

Homework Equations


∑Ma = 0
∑Hf = 0
∑Vf = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



For A I have set it up as follows.
Va + Vb = 60kN + 16kN (76kN)
The 16kN comes from 4kN* 4 from the diagonal force given.
I then took the moments about point A as follows.
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
5Vb = 202kN
Vb = 40.4kN which is NOT 36.54kN.

The horizontal forces are easy to calculate due to Vb being a roller support therefore Hb = 0 which ultimately means Ha = -12kN.

For the Support B!
Va+Vb = 50kN
Ha+Hb = 10kN (once again, Ha = -10kN because of the roller support at Hb = 0kN)

For this one however the support is at an angle. How to deal with supports at an angle? I figured it would just be Arctan(1/2) but that s giving me some strange answers which I know from just looking at aren't quite right.

Am I missing something crucial? I feel I must be overlooking something or are the answers I am calculating on Linpro software just incorrect and am I the one who is right? thanks
 

Attachments

  • wtututu.png
    wtututu.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 547
Physics news on Phys.org
King_Silver said:

Homework Statement


Below are attached 2 beams, A and B. I have to calculate the vertical and horizontal reactions at both supports in both questions. I have done a lot of calculations and believe I have a good understanding of what is needed to be done however my forces are not balancing for some reason. We use a software called LinPro and for Beam A the following answers are given: Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN

Homework Equations


∑Ma = 0
∑Hf = 0
∑Vf = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



For A I have set it up as follows.
Va + Vb = 60kN + 16kN (76kN)
The 16kN comes from 4kN* 4 from the diagonal force given.
I then took the moments about point A as follows.
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
5Vb = 202kN
Vb = 40.4kN which is NOT 36.54kN.

You must account for the direction of the individual moments. About point A, the 20 kN dist. load will have a CW rotation as will the 16 kN component force at the end. The reaction Vb will have a CCW rotation.
The horizontal forces are easy to calculate due to Vb being a roller support therefore Hb = 0 which ultimately means Ha = -12kN.

For the Support B!
Va+Vb = 50kN
Ha+Hb = 10kN (once again, Ha = -10kN because of the roller support at Hb = 0kN)

For this one however the support is at an angle. How to deal with supports at an angle? I figured it would just be Arctan(1/2) but that s giving me some strange answers which I know from just looking at aren't quite right.

Am I missing something crucial? I feel I must be overlooking something or are the answers I am calculating on Linpro software just incorrect and am I the one who is right? thanks

For the support on a slope, you must use the correct angle which is normal to the ground. Arctan (1/2) is not the correct angle normal to the ground.
 
SteamKing said:
You must account for the direction of the individual moments. About point A, the 20 kN dist. load will have a CW rotation as will the 16 kN component force at the end. The reaction Vb will have a CCW rotation.
For the support on a slope, you must use the correct angle which is normal to the ground. Arctan (1/2) is not the correct angle normal to the ground.

So you're saying instead of (20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + (16kN*7) = 5Vb
How would that change my values though? or am I misunderstanding? Also, are the answers Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN correct for Beam A?

Normal to the ground.. a flat surface is 180 degrees. The support is at a diagonal so it will have both a Hf and Vf component no?
 
King_Silver said:
So you're saying instead of (20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + (16kN*7) = 5Vb
How would that change my values though? or am I misunderstanding? Also, are the answers Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN correct for Beam A?

Normal to the ground.. a flat surface is 180 degrees. The support is at a diagonal so it will have both a Hf and Vf component no?
I thought you had two separate beams. What you have is a 2-D frame. View A represents a longitudinal elevation of this frame, while view B is looking from say the 2m vertical bar toward the other end. The tiny circle at the end of the 20 kN/m dist. load shows where this 5 m horizontal side beam connects to the 7 m long beam.

Since this 5 m side beam is loaded, your equilibrium equations are affected, which is why your initial calculations weren't working out.
 
  • Like
Likes King_Silver
SteamKing said:
I thought you had two separate beams. What you have is a 2-D frame. View A represents a longitudinal elevation of this frame, while view B is looking from say the 2m vertical bar toward the other end. The tiny circle at the end of the 20 kN/m dist. load shows where this 5 m horizontal side beam connects to the 7 m long beam.

Since this 5 m side beam is loaded, your equilibrium equations are affected, which is why your initial calculations weren't working out.

Got it sorted! I forgot about the pin and realized where I was going wrong cheers for that!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top