Calculating Volume of a Cylindrical Wedge

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



The problem is attached in the picture.



The Attempt at a Solution



What bothers me is that they say the wedge is bounded by x + z = a. Doesn't this imply that the calculated volume should only be half of what is written in the answers? I'm aware that the plane x + z = a can refer to either the left (negative) side or the right (positive) side. Do we choose one or simply take both?

Limits for x: 0 to a
Limits for y: 0 to √4ax
Limits for z: 0 to a-x


However, in http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CylindricalWedge.html the wedge is given as the full volume.
 

Attachments

  • wedge.jpg
    wedge.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 467
  • wedge2.jpg
    wedge2.jpg
    40.2 KB · Views: 455
Physics news on Phys.org
You have two possibilities: if a>0, then x>0 and z>0. If a<0, then also x<0 and z<0. No value of a works for both regions.
 
unscientific said:

Homework Statement



The problem is attached in the picture.



The Attempt at a Solution



What bothers me is that they say the wedge is bounded by x + z = a. Doesn't this imply that the calculated volume should only be half of what is written in the answers? I'm aware that the plane x + z = a can refer to either the left (negative) side or the right (positive) side. Do we choose one or simply take both?

Limits for x: 0 to a
Limits for y: 0 to √4ax
Limits for z: 0 to a-x

Assuming ##a>0##, the slanted plane is the "roof" of the solid. I see no reason to limit ##y## to only being positive.
 
LCKurtz said:
Assuming ##a>0##, the slanted plane is the "roof" of the solid. I see no reason to limit ##y## to only being positive.

I see! I initially thought that the x + z = a plane refers to the vertical plane i.e. the x-z plane. But now that you mention it, it actually refers to the plane that is sloping downwards from z = a to x = a, like a ramp.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top