Calculating Water Depth Using Snell's Law and Trigonometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter prehisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth Law Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the depth of water using Snell's Law and trigonometry, with a light beam entering water at a 60-degree angle. The user initially struggled with obtaining a negative value for distance x but later recalculated to find a positive value of 0.97. They applied Snell's Law to determine the angle of refraction and used trigonometric functions to express the height in terms of x. The conversation emphasizes the importance of showing detailed work and maintaining significant digits during calculations. Ultimately, the user seems to have resolved their confusion and is on the right track.
prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The light beam travels from air into water,the angle of incidence is 60 degress. The bent beam creates point F on the bottom of eater tank.If we imagine extension of incident beam inside the water, we obtain point B on the bottom of water tank. The distance between F and B is 1m. Calculate the depth of the water.
http://[url=http://postimg.org/image/rw3c1zipn/][PLAIN]http://s33.postimg.org/rw3c1zipn/bilde.jpg
bilde.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
First i used the Snells law to obtain the angle of the bent beam.
Second i thought i use trigonometric functions to obtain the height.
tg(angle1)=x/h and tg(angle2)=(x+1)/h
From which I obtained negative value of x, which confused me.
So guys, do you think this is the way to go or someone has any different ideas?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
prehisto said:

Homework Statement


The light beam travels from air into water,the angle of incidence is 60 degress. The bent beam creates point F on the bottom of eater tank.If we imagine extension of incident beam inside the water, we obtain point B on the bottom of water tank. The distance between F and B is 1m. Calculate the depth of the water.
http://[url=http://postimg.org/image/rw3c1zipn/][PLAIN]http://s33.postimg.org/rw3c1zipn/bilde.jpg
bilde.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
First i used the Snells law to obtain the angle of the bent beam.
Well, show how you applied Snell's law.
prehisto said:
Second i thought i use trigonometric functions to obtain the height.
tg(angle1)=x/h and tg(angle2)=(x+1)/h
Yes, this is the right way, What values did you substitute for angle1 and angle 2?
prehisto said:
From which I obtained negative value of x, which confused me.
So guys, do you think this is the way to go or someone has any different ideas?
It is impossible to get negative x, Show your work in detail.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes prehisto
From Snells law I obtained angle value 40,5 degrees (angle1)

ehild said:
t is impossible to get negative x, Show your work in detail.
From trigonometric equations I expressed h, so x/( tg(angle1) )= h and (x+1)/(tg(angle2))=h
Then x/(tg(angle1))=(x+1)/(tg(angle2))
And obtained x=- (tg(angle1)/(tg(angle1)-tg(angle2)

In fact, now I obteined positive value of 0,97. So I think everything is all right :)
 
From Snell's law n1sinα=n2sinβ where α is the angle of incidence and β is the angle between normal and beam in the water.
Using the given info,
sinα=√3/2=(x+1)\√(x+1)2+h2,
from here you get x= √3h-1 and x=-√3h-1 (however this is negative, so not a physical solution) and sinβ=x\√x2+h2=√3n1/2n2) which gives you an equation with 1 unknown, namely h, after substituting x=√3h-1. If I did not make any mistakes, the last equation should give you h.
 
prehisto said:
From Snells law I obtained angle value 40,5 degrees (angle1)From trigonometric equations I expressed h, so x/( tg(angle1) )= h and (x+1)/(tg(angle2))=h
Then x/(tg(angle1))=(x+1)/(tg(angle2))
And obtained x=- (tg(angle1)/(tg(angle1)-tg(angle2)

In fact, now I obteined positive value of 0,97. So I think everything is all right :)
Take care at the rounding. It is right otherwise, keep more significant digits during the calculations. You need to determine h from the x value yet.
 
  • Like
Likes prehisto
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top